Short Sellers Only
Seite 1 von 1 Neuester Beitrag: 31.03.17 22:16 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 18.12.16 23:32 | von: PastaPasta | Anzahl Beiträge: | 6 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 31.03.17 22:16 | von: PastaPasta | Leser gesamt: | 3.427 |
Forum: | Talk | Leser heute: | 1 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Also ich fange mal an:
SHORT: Wirecard $WDI
GRUND: corporate governance
LINKS: bekannt
Hallo! Wirecard ist ja schon ziemlich gefallen seit dem letzten Jahr. Ich bin leider etwas spät dran. Soll ich bei 39€ noch short gehen?
Antwort: no risk no fun!
Ich würde es im Moment nicht wagen, aber wenn Du schon short bist, dann hoffentlich mit KO-Kursen, bei denen Du ruhig schlafen kannst. Spekulativ würde ich dann sogar nachlegen, sobald die Wirecard mal aus dem Schlamm(assel) kommt.
Die Lage ist etwas verworren im Moment, das allgemeine Interesse an der Aktie gering, trotzdem hohe Umsätze. Was da genau abgeht, weiß keiner.
Achtung, 200-Tage werden heute nach oben durchbrochen und bisher halten sie trotz kleinerer Versuche. Sieht eher nach versöhnlichem Jahresabschluß aus. Ruhig und besinnlich. Wachsam bleiben!
(Eric Wong, Analyst, Blue Ridge Capital)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1299709/...91pressrelease.htm
BoFi's statements könnten auch aus der Feder der IR eines deutschen IPSP stammen...
A factually inaccurate and substantively misleading story was published in a widely circulated tabloid today. The story is nothing more than a rehash of baseless allegations that first surfaced over two years ago, and have been soundly refuted by BofI in court filings and on conference calls.
Since these meritless allegations first surfaced, the Bank has completed two record-setting fiscal years, closed two acquisitions that both required regulatory approval, successfully completed two full annual examinations, two mid-cycle examinations and multiple Federal Reserve Regulatory examinations.
The Bank and the Company remain in strong regulatory standing with no enforcement actions. Neither has been fined a single dollar by any regulatory agency, or been required to restate financials, or modify product offerings or business practices.
We do not foresee any future impact to the underlying business as a result of these frivolous allegations or their current repetition in the press. BofI Federal Bank, like other banks, is regularly examined by its federal regulators, external auditors, and internal auditors.
As previously disclosed by the Company, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors engaged one of the largest law firms in the world to conduct an independent investigation to determine whether there is support for these two year old allegations when they were made in an employment lawsuit filed by Charles Erhart.
After an extensive investigation, the outside law firm advised the Audit Committee that it found no support for the allegations set forth in the employment complaint, or that the Bank or its management engaged in wrongdoing or acts of fraud or impropriety.
Die Geschichte in der New Y>ork Post von heute:
http://nypost.com/2017/03/31/...ternet-for-possible-money-laundering/
Feds probe Bank of Internet for possible money laundering
Federal agents are conducting a probe into possible money laundering at online lender Bank of Internet, The Post has learned.
The Justice Department, which is leading the investigation, has interviewed at least one former employee of the San Diego-based bank, sources said.
Bank of Internet Chief Executive Gregory Garrabrants, head of the bank since 2007, is also a focus of the probe, sources said. Neither the 18-year-old bank nor Garrabrants has been accused of any criminal activity.
Man kann ja mal schauen, was dabei rauskommt... Könnte auch als Blueprint für einen deutschen IPSP taugen :)