Arafura Resources und die Charttechnik
Seite 54 von 188 Neuester Beitrag: 16.08.24 12:29 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 03.09.06 11:53 | von: Knappschaft. | Anzahl Beiträge: | 5.699 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 16.08.24 12:29 | von: henner55 | Leser gesamt: | 988.578 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 146 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 51 | 52 | 53 | | 55 | 56 | 57 | ... 188 > |
Ist natürlich nicht ausgeführt worden :-(
__________________________________________________
Besitzer von Zinspapieren schlafen gut; Aktienbesitzer dagegen leben gut
__________________________________________________
Besitzer von Zinspapieren schlafen gut; Aktienbesitzer dagegen leben gut
ARU wird seinen Weg gehen! *freu*
Ich habe auch ein long und ein Trading-Depot bei ARU.
Gestern 10.000 zu 0,985 bekommen und heute zu 1,17 verkauft, ich bin zufrieden!
__________________________________________________
Besitzer von Zinspapieren schlafen gut; Aktienbesitzer dagegen leben gut
Gruß Numbat
http://www.hotcopper.com.au/...fid=1&tid=498533&sym=ARU&msgno=1891137
grüße
gianni
Zitat:
"shareholder meeting in germany
some brief remarks:
- very impressive mgt. (strategic, smart, sensitive and funny)
- project financing seems to be no problem. 300m$ incl. working capital. Probably on a 25% equity + 75% off-take agreement. Seems to be no problem to find a partner. Roughly 75% of proposed production could be included into long-term (15 years+) off-take, 25% at spot. Off-take would have some price adjustment clauses. Not the potential partner with the best offer but the one with the best fit will get the deal. Alistair said that potential customers contact ARU and not the other way round...he added that no potential can't afford it not to contact ARU in order to check a deal. He further said that standing and reputation is very important in this intimate business with only a few market participants. Financing will be as late as possible in order to get better conditions.
--> minimal dilution is the message here and we seem to get a long term partner
- within the rare earth group two elements Neodymimum and Praseodym appear to be the most important one. The other material is difficult to sell due to overproduction (China has just 16% Neodymium and has to produce relatively more Neodym than ARU and therefore the other materials are in an over-supply status). But 12,000 US$/t REO seem to be appropriate price at the moment
- next weeks a pre-feasibility will be released. The resource update of Nolans Bore will not be included and will be released later this year. As far as cost is concerned the pre-feasibility won't be very concrete. Was very difficult to get some information from mgt. in terms of costs. After we insisted Alistair and Gavin developed a rough 'worst-case-scenario' and they ended up with 200 US$/tonne in operating margin (200 mln US$ at a 1 Mt annual production rate.
- the flow-sheet will be adapted to the new test-results but Alistair and Gavin didn't come out with the last specific details regarding a newly implemented process they neutrally call "washing". This will be the first step within the flow-sheet and it will improve the cost structure and the recovery. I was pretty much impressed that REO recoveries will be well above industry standard of 75-80% and Dudly (the rare earth consultant) added that we could expect something close to 90% (kalmsg, so you can adapt your projections where you use 64.5% recovery). The production of CaCl2 will be another kicker as the production cost is in the low double digits. P2O5 production will generate a very good quality product in fertilizer grade but upgrading to industry grade will be no problem. Bateman Litwin will construct the turn key processing line for the CaCl2 / P2O5 production and ANSTO will do for the REO/U3O8/Thorium complex.
- Cacl2 production will shake the market because ARU will be a significant player with by far the lowest production costs. Alistair is promoting the CaCl2 production of ARU actively in the business to send a signal to the CaCl2 producers NOT to set up another plant to inclease capacity. He further projects a decrease in CaCl2 prices when ARU enters the market and that's why the only calculate with 100US$/ton. But this is just a rough projection.
- thorium will be produced in a concentrate in Darwin and then be transported back to the Nolans Bore site in order to store it. This storage and the production of U3O8 (incl. transportation) could expose ARU to green and environmental oriented NOGs which was identified as one mayor project risk to deal with. As far as Thorium is concerned Alistair mentioned a currently circulating rumor that a US state-owned company called Thorium Inc has the order to retool 25% of the US atomic power station from uranium to Thorium feed. A Canadian power station sucessfully tested an operation with Thorium - but this is all rumors.
- the production in Nolans Bore will be year round (no significant wet season in the area) and most important water is abundant and "cookie" a Sydney based broker (Reynolds i guess) added that close to Nolans Bore there even is a vineyard. We asked about the water permits and Alistair answered that they already contacted the water authorities in Alice Springs and got signals that the permit would be granted. Anyway the water issue is another project risk but its good to know that the permit is a local decision and ARU mgt. board is well connected almost everywjere in N.T.
- as far as Mt. Porter gold is concerned Alistair mentioned that we could expect a news release in conjunction with this project soon. Guess they have arranged a tolling agreement or a sale of the whole property in order to generate more cash. THe same with Territory Iron - we will see a sale of the ARU royalty soon in order to get the cash now and not over the next 4-5 years.
- Alistair mentioned 15m A$ as a budget for the next year before the project financing is imminent. Probably we will get another small placement this year (think this will depend on the Mt. Porter/Territory Iron sale/deals)
- at some point Alistair showed us his qualities as a comedian and reported in Charly Chaplin style about the visit at a Chinese Rare Earth plant. A worker shovled 99% pure rare earth material in a bag but suddenly some material fell down to the throwouts pile. The worker didn't really care a shovled a good portion of the throwouts into the 99% bag. Bottom line is that customers in China never really know what you get and not every bag contains the material that it should. This is another advantage of ARU because they can offen very good quality management
- I asked for the reasons for the decision in favour of Darwin as the future location for the processing lines - if it was a political or a economical decision. First (my impression) Gavin and Alistair hided behind the sovereign risk argument in Malaysia but later it appeared to me that a decision for Darwin will help the Nolans Project to be developed and Gavin explained in cryptic formulations that ARU will likely get some tax incentives as well. Mentioning another risk ARU is aware the fact that there will be some resistance to the development of a chemical production in Darwin. Currently a Biodiesel facility in situated in Darwin but no other significant chemical production. On the other side ARU will provide further jobs to Darwin and will demand natural gas that seems to be in an oversupply status in Darwin. Alistair mentioned that they hope to convince a chemical company to set up a hydrochloric plant beside the ARU facilities so that ARU could by the chemicals needed for the separation of materials could be bought over the fence
- I have forgotten that Alistair mentioned the possibility of a 2009 production start if the supply gap of Rare Earth would be imminent. I guess it will depend on their talks with potential customers. They have been (amongst others) to Treibacher AG (Klagenfurt, Austria) and Zirax (London), they have been to Japan and to Manchester just before the presentation in London tomorrow. The 2009 production is not a primary target of ARU to my understanding but more of an option if a well fitting customer appears
- as far as Jervois is concerned Alistair downplayed the project a bit. He said that it is a great indeed with 14 out of 15 drill holes containing mineralisation in an initial drill program but Jervois won't be developed before 2013-2014. It could be the next big project ARU will develop. In conjunction with Jervois we were talking about another potential risk - the availability of drill-rigs. ARU still hasn't secured a rig for Jervois for the follow-up drilling and for the next drilling program at Nolans Bore too. We probably will have to wait another 9-12 months for the next drilling results from Jervois. At Nolans they scheduled another 2-3 mln drill program in order to upgrade the resources and probably to find even more shallow material. Alistair explained that the first pit will be as deep as 75m because they have so much shallow lying material..."
Da Alistair auch ein gewisses Risiko bei der Erteilung der nötigen Genehmigungen sowohl für die Mine als auch die Produktionsanlagen sieht,wurden schon sehr früh unabhängige Arbeitsgruppen aus Behörden und Regierungsvertern zusammen mit ARU Mitarbeitern gebildet,die die gesamte Planung begleiten und auch beeinflussen.Das führt nach Aussage von Alistair (ist auch meine Meinung)dazu ,das bei Antragstellung auf Genehmigungen die Entscheider das Projekt kennen und auch dessen Planung entsprechend Ihrer Vorgaben beeinflusst haben.Dies wird sicher zu einer schnelleren Bearbeitung und Genehmigung führen.Und,das ist meine Meinung:welcher Behördenvertreter wird schon ein Projekt nicht genehmigen an dessen Planung er beteiligt war ??!!
mfg
Numbat
p.s.da ich in wo nicht registriert bin ist vielleicht jemand so nett und stellt den Beitrag dort ein.Es gab schon ein paar postings zu dem Thema
Danke
Da war der Kurs heute auch ne ganze Zeit - bis heute nachmittag! Da ist er auf einmal auf 1,14 geklettert.
Erklärungen?
http://www.small-cap-trader.com/boersenbriefe/...-25-boersenbrief.pdf
__________________________________________________
Besitzer von Zinspapieren schlafen gut; Aktienbesitzer dagegen leben gut