YRCW vor charttechnischem Turnaround
Seite 47 von 79 Neuester Beitrag: 09.08.23 20:35 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 11.01.12 17:35 | von: thekey | Anzahl Beiträge: | 2.967 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 09.08.23 20:35 | von: yahooyoshi | Leser gesamt: | 312.646 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 176 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 44 | 45 | 46 | | 48 | 49 | 50 | ... 79 > |
YRC Worldwide, Inc. is expected* to report earnings on 08/02/2013. The report will be for the fiscal Quarter ending Jun 2013. According to Zacks Investment Research, based on 3 analysts' forecasts, the consensus EPS forecast for the quarter is $-0.93. The reported EPS for the same quarter last year was $-3.21.
Consensus Recommendation
Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/earnings/report/yrcw#ixzz2ZnsFmgav
richtung 40$ YRC Zahlen werden bestimmt besser sein als erwartet da einige Monate auch bei der Konkurrenz Extrem gut waren. ;-))
Swift Transportation record operating revenue
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/07/09/...ansportation.aspx
Ich freu mich schon diese Woche auf die Q2 Zahlen.. ;-))
Kein Kauf oder verkaufsempfehlung!!!
Verschiedene Quellen liefern unterschiedliche Resultate.
By Brian Nichols - July 22, 2013| Tickers: ABFS, JBHT, YRCW| 0 Comments
Brian is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.
There is no company that has more to lose, or gain, than YRC Worldwide(NASDAQ: YRCW) this earnings season. The company will report earnings on July 29, and investors are placing their bets on what could be a very volatile session.
Why The Excitement?
YRC Worldwide has exploded with gains of 330% in the last three months. The company’s gains were created after they posted an operating income for the first time in six years. For their last quarter, operating income was $9.9 million, compared to ($48.8 million) in the year prior, a difference of $58.7 million.
This improvement on lower revenue demonstrates the execution of aggressive cost-cutting measures. However, Q1 results were actually comparable to what we had seen in previous quarters. In Q4 of 2012 operating income increased $68.1 million year-over-year; in Q3 of 2012 it increased $53.4 million.
YRC Worldwide’s chief problem is that they still have large interest payments on debt outstanding, meaning that net income is still in the red. This company has diluted shares, accumulated debt, and cut costs to the max over the last few years, yet many are betting on their turnaround.
Whether or not YRC Worldwide’s three month rally is a result of perception or fundamental improvements is up to the eye of the beholder. However, the market as a whole seems to like what it sees.
Looking ahead, YRC Worldwide does have macro improvements in its favor, and such improvements could be enough to continue its bullish trend. For example, data that measures the tonnage of freight that is transported by motor carriers has significantly jumped. In April, this trucking tonnage index jumped 4.3% year-over-year; in May it rose 6.7%.
The fact that trucks are carrying larger loads could bode well for companies such as YRC Worldwide this earnings season.
How Does YRC Measure?
YRC Worldwide’s market cap of $255 million does not justify the size of the company. YRC Worldwide has annual revenue in excess of $4.8 billion, giving it an industry-best price/sales ratio of 0.06.
YRC Worldwide’s most notable competitors are Arkansas Best(NASDAQ: ABFS) and JB Hunt Transport (NASDAQ: JBHT). These are known as asset-based trucking companies, meaning they own their own trucks.
Arkansas Best has traded higher by 135% in 2013, partially because of merger rumors with YRC Worldwide. However, the proposal was refused by Arkansas Best.
While Arkansas Best and YRC Worldwide would have good synergies, Arkansas Best’s market cap is about twice that of YRC Worldwide, though Arkansas Best has half as much revenue. Arkansas Best is a growth company – with double digit top-line growth – but is still unprofitable, with operating margins of negative 0.7%.
Arkansas Best trades at 0.28 times sales, which is still cheap. The reason Arkansas Best is cheap is due to its costs, as the company pays large pension expenses and has a high fixed-cost structure due to it being unionized. Nonetheless, Arkansas Best still has better, more bullish metrics than YRC.
JB Hunt is the ideal company in the asset-based space, and reflects the gold standard for operational efficiency. JB Hunt has operating margins of 10%, which is remarkable in this space. The company, with revenue of $5.2 billion, is not much larger than YRC, but its operating efficiency has earned it a higher premium at 1.72 times sales.
Final Thoughts
YRC has been awarded the lowest valuation of its competitors because it has the most significant operational flaws. Sure, the company has made vast improvements over the last year, but there are still many questions as to whether or not they can produce income after payments on debt outstanding.
This upcoming quarter will tell us a lot. It will tell us the direction that YRC is moving, and if last quarter’s operating profit was a fluke. The company has positive momentum in its favor, and has tremendous upside potential compared to its industry. Therefore, I do think it is a stock worth watching, but for safety reasons, I’d view it with caution ahead of its earnings report.
http://beta.fool.com/briannichols/2013/07/22/is-this-company-a-gamble-ahead-of-earnings/41024/?source=eogyholnk0000001
Looking ahead, YRC Worldwide does have macro improvements in its favor, and such improvements could be enough to continue its bullish trend. For example, data that measures the tonnage of freight that is transported by motor carriers has significantly jumped. In April, this trucking tonnage index jumped 4.3% year-over-year; in May it rose 6.7%.
http://beta.fool.com/briannichols/2013/07/22/...urce=eogyholnk0000001
das die 350 Millionen werden Vielleicht gegend Schulden in Aktien umgewandeln..
Das würde heißen wenn so kommen würde das wir Plötzlich für ein paar Aktien mehr plus austehende 250 Millonen umwandlung..
1.) Die Schulden um fast 50% reduziert hätten das wäre für alle beteiligten vor allem für uns Aktionäre ein sehr Lukrativer Gewinn.
2.) YRC müsste 50% weniger Schulden Tilgen, hätte mehr Geld für nue Investitionen.
3.) Wert der Aktie würde trotz eine Minimale Verwesserung Brutal steigen.
4.) Für alle beteiligten würde eine WIN-WIN situation Entstehen...
Wenn es dazu kommen würde, wäre das Super für uns finde ich...;-)))
Hammer... Mehr als 850 Jobs stehen zu verfügung...... ;-)))
Das ist ein gutes Zeichen ;-))
http://www.yrcw.com/careers/jobs/hub.shtml
Below are the three companies in the Trucking industry with the lowest price to sales per share ratios. Often companies with the lowest ratio present the greatest value to investors.
YRC Worldwide ranks lowest with a a price to sales ratio of 0.05. Following is Frozen Food Express Industries with a a price to sales ratio of 0.10. USA Truck ranks third lowest with a a price to sales ratio of 0.12.
Vitran follows with a a price to sales ratio of 0.13, and Covenant Transportation rounds out the bottom five with a a price to sales ratio of 0.14.
SmarTrend recommended that subscribers consider buying shares of USA Truck on January 17th, 2013 as our technology indicated a new Uptrend was in progress when shares hit $3.65. Since that recommendation, shares of USA Truck have risen 71.5%. We continue to monitor USA Truck for any potential shift so investors can protect gains and will alert SmarTrend subscribers immediately.
http://www.mysmartrend.com/news-briefs/news-watch/...yrcw-ffex-usak-v
Das Finanzamt hätte sich verrechnet, man würde mit der Behörde kooperieren.
Da steht das YRC meint dass es ein Irrtum ist und dass Sie selbstverständlich dieses Problem klären werden..
Also..Es gibt Kein Grund zur sorge.. ;-))
Bist du draußen? oder warum wird die Meldung falsch halbherzig Interpretiert? *grins*
YRC said in a statement Monday that it is taking responsibility for the tax lien.
"MIQ was sold in 2010; however, the 2008 tax year is at issue, and the company has indemnification liability under the sales contract," the statement said. "The company is working in full cooperation with the IRS to resolve the lien, which appears to be an IRS administrative error."
ATA Truck Tonnage Index Rose 0.1% in June
Arlington, Va. — The American Trucking Associations’ advanced seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index edged 0.1% higher in June after surging 2.1% in May. (May’s increase was slightly lower than the 2.3% gain ATA reported on June 18, 2013.) In June, the SA index equaled 125.9 (2000=100) versus 125.8 in May. June 2013 is the highest level on record. Compared with June 2012, the SA index surged 5.9%, which is robust, although below May’s 6.5% year-over-year gain. Year-to-date, compared with the same period in 2012, the tonnage index is up 4.7%.
The not seasonally adjusted index, which represents the change in tonnage actually hauled by the fleets before any seasonal adjustment, equaled 125.9 in June, which was 5% below the previous month (132.4).
“The fact that tonnage didn’t fall back after the 2.1% surge in May is quite remarkable,” ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said. “While housing starts were down in June, tonnage was buoyed by other areas like auto production which was very strong in June and durable-goods output, which increased 0.5% during the month according to the Federal Reserve.”
“Robust auto sales also helped push retail sales higher, helping tonnage in June.” he said, “The trend this year is heavy freight, like autos and energy production, is growing faster than lighter freight, which is pushing truck tonnage up.”
Note on the impact of trucking company failures on the index: Each month, ATA asks its membership the amount of tonnage each carrier hauled, including all types of freight. The indexes are calculated based on those responses. The sample includes an array of trucking companies, ranging from small fleets to multi-billion dollar carriers. When a company in the sample fails, we include its final month of operation and zero it out for the following month, with the assumption that the remaining carriers pick up that freight. As a result, it is close to a net wash and does not end up in a false increase. Nevertheless, some carriers are picking up freight from failures and it may have boosted the index. Due to our correction mentioned above however, it should be limited.
Trucking serves as a barometer of the U.S. economy, representing 68.5% of tonnage carried by all modes of domestic freight transportation, including manufactured and retail goods. Trucks hauled 9.4 billion tons of freight in 2012. Motor carriers collected $642.1 billion, or 80.7% of total revenue earned by all transport modes.
ATA calculates the tonnage index based on surveys from its membership and has been doing so since the 1970s. This is a preliminary figure and subject to change in the final report issued around the 10th day of the month. The report includes month-to-month and year-over-year results, relevant economic comparisons, and key financial indicators.
http://www.truckline.com/...?uid=ac7c219e-694c-4bb8-a23e-d70307577c08
Arlington, Va. — The American Trucking Associations’ advanced seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index edged 0.1% higher in June after surging 2.1% in May. (May’s increase was slightly lower than the 2.3% gain ATA reported on June 18, 2013.) In June, the SA index equaled 125.9 (2000=100) versus 125.8 in May. June 2013 is the highest level on record. Compared with June 2012, the SA index surged 5.9%, which is robust, although below May’s 6.5% year-over-year gain. Year-to-date, compared with the same period in 2012, the tonnage index is up 4.7%.
Und YRC hat ja auch gesagt, dass sie mit dem Finanzamt kooperieren!
Und die Verantwortung dafür übernehmen!
YRC said in a statement Monday that it is taking responsibility for the tax lien.
Stimmt ja alles gar nicht! Sommerloch! Auf Truckingboards schreib heute einer:
The IRS should fill out a pay request.. then wait 2 weeks to get their money.
Eines bin ich aber mit Sicherheit nicht: Doof und blauäugig!