Neue Novavax: Anstieg nach 1:20 Re-Split
Seite 4 von 354 Neuester Beitrag: 10.06.24 19:00 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 15.05.19 08:23 | von: moneywork4. | Anzahl Beiträge: | 9.84 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 10.06.24 19:00 | von: Unicorn71 | Leser gesamt: | 2.188.794 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 470 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | 2 | 3 | | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... 354 > |
The Gaithersburg biotech has raked in $98.7 million in net proceeds this quarter from selling 10.5 million shares of common stock at $9.55 per share....
https://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2020/...oo&yptr=yahoo
https://www.c-span.org/video/?469926-1/...ical-executives-coronavirus
Ich lehne mich jetzt mal weit aus dem Fenster und sage, genau so wird es kommen, imho.
Kommentar aus dem Yahoo Finance Forum: Wir haben nicht in Novavax für das Coronavirus investiert. Es könnte mich weniger interessieren. Nanoflu zerstörte Fluzone HD in Phase 2, daher sollte Phase 3 ein Kinderspiel sein. Was kann sich tatsächlich an den Ergebnissen ändern? Das Nanopartikel mit dem Matrix M-Adjuvans ist ein Kraftpaket! Ich werde das sagen. Novavax hat ein weltweit benötigtes Grippemedikament entwickelt! 12,48 $? Das ist wie freies Geld! Investieren investieren und investieren! In weniger als 30 Tagen ist der ROI hervorragend.
(TMFFishBiz):
"There's no way to know for sure which of these biotech stocks will be the bigger winner over the long run. If I had to pick just one of them, though, it would be Novavax.
Inovio does appear to have a slight lead with its coronavirus program. However, Novavax has a major catalyst coming up in a matter of weeks with the announcement of results for NanoFlu. My view is that Novavax has a reasonable chance of getting a product on the market much sooner than Inovio does.
Keep in mind, though, that both of these stocks are very risky. Their experimental COVID-19 vaccines and their other pipeline candidates could flop in clinical studies. While I think Novavax has the edge right now, it's best to be very cautious when investing in clinical-stage biotechs."
Es ist nicht sicher, welche dieser Biotech-Aktien auf lange Sicht der größere Gewinner sein wird. Wenn ich nur einen auswählen müsste, wäre es Novavax. Inovio scheint mit seinem Coronavirus-Programm einen leichten Vorsprung zu haben. Novavax hat jedoch innerhalb weniger Wochen mit der Bekanntgabe der Ergebnisse für NanoFlu einen wichtigen Katalysator vor sich. Meiner Ansicht nach hat Novavax eine vernünftige Chance, ein Produkt viel früher auf den Markt zu bringen als Inovio. Beachten Sie jedoch, dass beide Aktien sehr riskant sind. Ihre experimentellen COVID-19-Impfstoffe und ihre anderen Pipeline-Kandidaten könnten in klinischen Studien versagen. Ich denke, Novavax hat momentan die Nase vorn, aber es ist am besten, sehr vorsichtig zu sein, wenn Sie in Biotech-Unternehmen im klinischen Stadium investieren.
-CEPI to provide an initial $4 million to accelerate vaccine development to prepare for Phase 1
-Multiple vaccine candidates being tested in preclinical studies prior to advancing to human trials
-Phase 1 clinical trial expected to initiate in late spring of 2020
http://ir.novavax.com/news-releases/...i-covid-19-vaccine-development
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/...titute-india-develop-144548684.html
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/...vax-coronavirus-play-190117201.html
Novavax’ NanoFlu Achieves All Primary Endpoints In Phase 3 Clinical Trial
These strong Phase 3 results align with and validate our previous clinical trials, in which NanoFlu showed higher HAI antibody responses than the leading flu vaccine for older adults.
http://ir.novavax.com/news-releases/...ary-endpoints-phase-3-clinical
Read more at:
https://thefly.com/landingPageNews.php?id=3059689
Read more at:
https://thefly.com/landingPageNews.php?id=3059696
26th March 2020
Image
by
Anna Smith
Novavax has unveiled new Phase III data showing that its recombinant quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine candidate, NanoFlu, met all primary endpoints in adults aged 65 and older against Sanofi’s Fluzone Quadrivalent.
As a results of the successful data, the company has announced plans to submit a filing to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the agency's accelerated approval pathway.
In the trial, geometric mean titers (GMT) at day 28 for NanoFlu were 24% to 66% higher than for Fluzone Quadrivalent, while the experimental vaccine was associated with 11.4 to 20.4 higher seroconversion rates (SCR) percentage points than the Sanofi drug.
Top-line results showed that NanoFlu achieved the primary endpoints, using both GMT and SCR, for all four strains included in the vaccine, as measured by haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays using egg-derived reagents.
According to the company, NanoFlu was also well tolerated in the Phase III study and had a safety profile comparable to Fluzone Quadrivalent, but was associated "with a modest increase in local adverse events."
Last year Novavax announced that its respiratory syncytial virus vaccine ResVax failed to hit its main goal, despite showing efficacy against a secondary objective, preventing RSV LRTI hospitalisations by 44%.
Share
http://ih.advfn.com/...p;width=800&vol=1&height=400&Vol=1
https://de.advfn.com/borse/NASDAQ/NVAX/chart
nachbörslich tatsächlich noch die 15$ angekratzt
https://de.advfn.com/borse/NASDAQ/NVAX/chart