Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH)
Seite 532 von 568 Neuester Beitrag: 26.09.24 05:48 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 10.09.08 00:24 | von: Abenteurer | Anzahl Beiträge: | 15.197 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 26.09.24 05:48 | von: Teras | Leser gesamt: | 2.161.980 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 73 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 530 | 531 | | 533 | 534 | ... 568 > |
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 51821 [Berichtet schon unter Docket #51821 - Subpoena(s) ISSUED].
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765114
Die entsprechenden Witnesses hatten inzwischen cooperiert,
so dass die Subpoenas haben zurückzogen werden können...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 52232 [Berichtet unter Docket #52232 - "Suggestion" of Recusal]...
Document: [Siehe dort].
Das Gericht hat sich also entschlossen, die armseelige Befangenheits-"Suggestion" des William Kuntz III. in den Rang einer Motion (also in den Rang eines förmlichen Feststellungs-Antrags) zu heben, um das Ding gerichtlich entscheiden zu können.
Das ist geübte gerichtliche Praxis! - Denn wenn ein Verfahrens-Beteiligter zum Beispiel durch ein störendes Hüsteln auffällt, darf ein Richter ja auch zu eigener Einschätzung kommen, ob die Geräusches-Darbietung zur Ironisierung seines Amtes-Waltens gedacht war, oder eher unbeabsichtigt einer rauhen Kehle entspringt, oder auf eine Erkrankung hindeutet, die eine Verhandlungs-Verschiebung rechtfertigen kann...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 52232 [Reported under Docket #52232 - "Suggestion" of Recusal]...
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765463
Und jetzt also die Klatsche für William Kuntz III. - Die Richterin weist ihm seine in den Rang einer förmlichen Motion gehobene Befangenheits-"Suggestion" sauber zurück...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 47589 [Already reported under Docket #47589 - Motion to ALLOW]...
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765542
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765786
Die Argumente, die er da bringt, sind allerdings ernsthaft...
to certain Claim(s), the Majority of the Objections is hereby not affected...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765818
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Exhibit List, # (2) Exhibit A-1, # (3) Exhibit A-2,
# (4) Exhibit A-3, # (5) Exhibit A-4, # (6) Exhibit A-5, # (7) Exhibit A-6,
# (8) Exhibit A-7, # (9) Exhibit A-8, # (10) Exhibit A-9, # (11) Exhibit A-10,
# (12) Exhibit A-11, # (13) Exhibit A-12, # (14) Exhibit A-13, # (15) Exhibit A-14,
# (16) Exhibit A-15, # (17) Exhibit A-16, # (18) Exhibit A-17, # (19) Exhibit A-18,
# (20) Exhibit A-19, # (21) Exhibit A-20, # (22) Exhibit A-21, # (23) Exhibit A-22,
# (24) Exhibit A-23, # (25) Exhibit A-24, # (26) Exhibit A-25, # (27) Exhibit A-26,
# (28) Exhibit A-27, # (29) Exhibit A-28, # (30) Exhibit A-29, # (31) Exhibit A-30,
# (32) Exhibit A-31, # (33) Exhibit A-32, # (34) Exhibit A-33, # (35) Exhibit A-34,
# (36) Exhibit A-35, # (37) Exhibit A-36, # (38) Exhibit A-37, # (39) Exhibit A-38,
# (40) Exhibit A-39). (Rossman, Andrew).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 52113 [Reported under Docket #52113 - Motion for SANCTIONS]...
Documents:
MAIN Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765831
Exhibit LIST: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765832
[To be continued]...
Exhibit A-2: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765834
Exhibit A-3: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765835
Exhibit A-4: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765836
Exhibit A-5: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765837
Exhibit A-6: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765838
Exhibit A-7: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765839
Exhibit A-8: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765840
Exhibit A-9: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765841
Exhibit A-10: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765842
Exhibit A-11: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765843
Exhibit A-12: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765844
Exhibit A-13: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765845
Exhibit A-14: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765846
Exhibit A-15: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765847
Exhibit A-16: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765848
Exhibit A-17: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765849
Exhibit A-18: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765850
Exhibit A-19: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765851
[To be continued]...
Exhibit A-21: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765853
Exhibit A-22: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765854
Exhibit A-23: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765855
Exhibit A-24: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765856
Exhibit A-25: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765857
Exhibit A-26: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765858
Exhibit A-27: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765859
Exhibit A-28: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765860
Exhibit A-29: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765861
Exhibit A-30: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765862
Exhibit A-31: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765863
Exhibit A-32: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765864
Exhibit A-33: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765865
Exhibit A-34: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765866
Exhibit A-35: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765867
Exhibit A-36: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765868
Exhibit A-37: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765869
Exhibit A-38: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765870
Exhibit A-39: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2765871
Filed by William Kuntz III. (White, Greg).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 52236 [Reported under Docket #52236 - Order DENYING Motion]...
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2766011
(I) Reply to Response to and
(II) Supplemental Objection to Certain Claims Listed on Debtors Two Hundred Seventeenth Omnibus Objection signed on MAR/04/2016 (related document(s) [51691]). (White, Greg).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 51691 [Reported under Docket #51691 - 217th Omnibus Objection].
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2766013
All Portions of the Claims #62826, #62827 and #62828 are hereby disallowed and expunged with Prejudice...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 52113 [Reported under Docket #52113 - MOTION for Sanctions]...
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2766475
Die Löwin fährt die Krallen aus! - The Honorable Judge Shelley C. Chapman kann sich die Torpedierung des von ihr -übrigens sehr umsichtig! - geleiteten Verfahrens natürlich nicht bieten lassen, und so erkennt sie, quasi als einen Schuss vor den Bug, zunächst hauptsächlich auf einen Bedarf der Sanctionierung als solchen. - Welche concreten Sanctionen darüber hinaus vielleicht noch nötig werden könnten, wird von der weiteren Entwicklung abhängig gemacht. - Wie ich doch meine, eine sehr weise Entscheidung...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2766450
Concret betroffen sind hier dies' Mal die CounterParties:
BUCK Institute for Age Research,
EXUM Ridge CBO 2007-1, Ltd.
und RACERS 2005-10-C.
Im Rahmen der thematischen Einschlägigkeit vergleiche man das
Docket #51959 - 24th Termination Notice...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 51601 [See under Docket #51601 - MOTION for Reconsideration]...
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2767025
Ich hatte ihm ja die Daumen gedrückt ;-))
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 51451 [Reported under Docket #51451 - 513th Omnibus Objection].
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2767027
Kleinvieh macht auch Mist: Immerhin 1.633.477,56 US-Dollares beim Orcus...
(White, Greg).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768150
Betrifft die Lehman Brothers, Inc. (LBI),
also nicht die Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (LBHI)...
LG: Teras.
(Attachments: # (1) Form of Order, # (2) Exhibit A to Form of Order, # (3) Exhibit B to Form of Order, # (4) Exhibit C to Form of Order, # (5) Exhibit D to Form of Order). (Shelley, Scott).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 48939, 51312, 52215.
Documents:
MAIN Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768285
FORM of Order: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768286
Exhibit A hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768287
Exhibit B hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768288
Exhibit C hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768289
Exhibit D hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768290
(related document(s) [51937]) Filed by Banco Di Desio E Della Brianza SPA.
(Lopez, Mary).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 51937.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2768647
Doch ging es hierbei in beiden Dockets jeweils nur um einen Claim(s) Transfer...
damit wir auf Grund von Zugriffs-Problemen nicht irgend etwas übersehen...
LG: Teras.
damit wir auf Grund von Zugriffs-Problemen nicht irgend etwas übersehen...
LG: Teras.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 52215 [Already reported under Docket #52215 - Notice of Hearing]...
Document: [No separate Document necessary for administrative Entry #52301].
(I) Allowing Disclosure of Derivative Questionnaires Pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and
(II) Modifying the Treatment Afforded to the Derivative Questionnaires of Certain Parties (Related Doc # [52215]) signed on MAR/16/2016. (White, Greg).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 52215 [Already reported under Docket #52215 - Notice of Hearing].
Documents:
MAIN Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2769817
Exhibit A hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2769818
Exhibit B hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2769819
Exhibit C hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2769820
Exhibit D hereto: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2769821
Die im Exhibit A / in der Anlage A gelisteten non!-objecting Parties sind also weiterhin ganz klar in der absoluten Mehrheit...
(Fail, Garrett).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 51450 [Reported under Docket #51450 - 512th Omnibus Objection].
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2770428
Und, nun ja, man wird es kaum glauben: Wir sind jetzt wieder voll "up to Date!"...