Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH)
Seite 440 von 568 Neuester Beitrag: 28.01.25 14:39 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 10.09.08 00:34 | von: Abenteurer | Anzahl Beiträge: | 15.198 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 28.01.25 14:39 | von: jacky6 | Leser gesamt: | 2.217.925 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 827 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 438 | 439 | | 441 | 442 | ... 568 > |
of Persons and Entities filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: "none"...
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193683
20 (TWENTY!) CLAIM(s) withdrawn by ClearBridge Focus Equity, L.P.
after that "Witness" having received a tiny little Piece of SUBPOENA:
==> Docket #32659 - Subpoena ISSUED...
of Persons and Entities filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: "none".
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193686
The "Witness" ClearBridge Classic Value Flexible 130/30, L.P.
withdraws 20 (TWENTY!) Claims after having been served a SUBPOENA:
==> "none": Docket #32658 - Subpoena ISSUED...
of Persons and Entities filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: "none".
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193685
The "Witness" ClearBridge Active Equity Flexible 130/30, L.P.
withdraws 20 (TWENTY!) Claims after having been served a SUBPOENA:
"None", but RELATED nevertheless: ==> Docket #32657 - Subpoena ISSUED...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193895
$ _,260,123.69 of ==> Claim #22810 withdrawn
plus
$ 3,943,232.30 of ==> Claim #43355 withdrawn,
totalling to
$ 4,203,355.99 having been withdrawn...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193903
A very small Amount withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193905
A very small Amount withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193913
A small Amount withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2193916
$ 233,480.-- withdrawn.
of Proofs of Claim of BBT Fund, L.P., BBT Master Fund, L.P., and SRI Fund, L.P.,
dated January 10, 2013 filed by Luke A Barefoot on behalf of SRI Fund, L.P.,
BBT Master Fund, L.P., BBT Fund, L.P. (Barefoot, Luke).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2194222
Claimants reduce their Claims by
$ 127,423,324.21 and by
$ 100,667,720.13 and by
$ _62,081,710.41 and direct the Claim(s) Registrar to reflect those withdrawals...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2194386
A very small Amount withdawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 237.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2194958
Claimants withdraw their "Proofs" of Claim numbered 29554
and 29558 having been claimed "unliquidated" before...
hab versucht einfache, kurze passagen zu liefern. wer es nicht weiss: wir, ex-common shareholder sind class 12 (in the OBS, the one single share)
More recently, the Third Circuit dealt a blow to the use of giftsharing
arrangements in In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.10
In that case, the gift-sharing issues focused on the plan’s treatment
of three classes: a class of general unsecured creditors
(Class 6), a class of holders of asbestos-related personal-injury
claims (Class 7), and a class of equity interests (Class 12). The
plan provided for the distribution of warrants to Class 12 equity
holders if all classes of creditors voted for the plan. To address
issues in achieving consensus, the plan also expressly contemplated
that unsecured creditors might vote against the plan, and
provided for an alternative mechanism for distributing the warrants
in that event. Specifi cally, if Class 6 voted to reject the plan,
the new warrants would be issued to the Class 7 asbestos claimants
and, in turn, the Class 7 claimants would automatically waive
receipt of the warrants, which would then be issued to the Class
12 shareholders.
A classic example of a gift scenario is one in which an undersecured creditor with a first priority all-assets lien negotiates with unsecured creditors to permit them to receive a distribution, despite the fact that administrative and priority creditors will not receive full payment. The case law on the permissibility of gift arrangements is largely unsettled and continues to develop.
Generally, the Bankruptcy Code establishes a waterfall for distribution of estate proceeds: secured creditors are paid first, then administrative creditors and priority claimants, then general unsecured creditors, and, finally, equity holders. Under the absolute priority rule, a plan is “fair and equitable” even if classes of unsecured creditors or equity holders do
not receive the full value of their claims and interests, if no class junior to each of them receives or retains anything of value under the plan on account of their claims or interests.
February 1, 2013
The Trustee, consistent with his obligation to return property to customers and other creditors, has filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of an order to allocate assets among the customer and general estates. This is the necessary first step toward making additional distributions on allowed claims.
The amount of future distributions is dependent on finalizing agreements in principle with Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI) and Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE). The Trustee remains in active and cooperative discussions with LBHI and LBIE and believes final agreements will result.
If agreements are reached in the near term and pending Court approval, the Trustee can move forward with the potential 100 percent satisfaction of allowed customer claims. If the agreements are not finalized in the immediate future, Court Approval of allocation would put the Trustee in the position to make a substantial interim distribution on allowed claims. In either case, the allocation motion supports the Trustee’s duties to return property to customers and other creditors while at the same time treating all interests fairly.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195251
$ 124,792.-- withdrawn.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195252
A very, very small Amount withdrawn.
(Claims and Noticing Agent). (Baer, Herbert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195427
Claimant withdraws 22 (TWENTY-TWO!) Claims, totalling to an Amount of
$ 341,820,230.48 (21 x $16,249,306.-- + 1 x $584,804.48)...
Has there been a Subpoena?
==> Docket #32572 - Subpoena ISSUED!
GPC LXIV, LLC received their Subpoena on November 30, 2012; Documents had to be produced "by January 4, 2013" - pretty well BEFORE they withdrew their 22 "Claims":
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195459
(Claims and Noticing Agent). (Baer, Herbert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195460
A small Amount withdrawn.
filed by Sparkasse Bielefeld. (Lopez, Mary).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195717
Wer bei der Sparkasse Bielefeld ist, muss sich um seine Dinge stets SELBER kümmern...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195602
$ 179,812.-- withdrawn.
of Persons and Entities filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195698
Issuance of one single SUBPOENA ==> Docket #33323 - Subpoena ISSUED
was very helpful in Helping this Multiclaimant withdraw 20 (TWENTY!) Claims.
Withdrawn Claims #18370 - #18379 can be reviewed HERE:
==> http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/...amp;ex=false&maxPerPage=25&page=1 and
Withdrawn Claims #18380 - #18389 can be reviewed HERE:
==> http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/...amp;ex=false&maxPerPage=25&page=1
of Persons and Entities filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195699
Claimant Halbis US Credit Alpha Master Fund, Ltd. withdraws an Amount
of "no less than" $ 1,228,570.59 after having been served a SUBPOENA:
==> Docket #32442 - Subpoena ISSUED...
of Persons and Entities filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195700
Claimant Harlan Investment Limited withdraws a Claim in the Amount of
$ 10,502,808.-- "plus Interest and additional unliquidated and contingent
Amounts" after having received a SUBPOENA:
==> Docket #32443 - Subpoena ISSUED...
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/2195710
"Not less than" $ 8,181,442.69 withdrawn.