-ValCom- Fluch oder Segen?.. Aktie mit Potential !
Seite 418 von 437 Neuester Beitrag: 24.04.21 23:48 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 23.06.11 17:17 | von: Brokerface03. | Anzahl Beiträge: | 11.916 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 24.04.21 23:48 | von: Jessikainjya | Leser gesamt: | 949.324 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 10 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 416 | 417 | | 419 | 420 | ... 437 > |
jemand von euch auf diese Seite zugreifen. Mit meiner E-Mail geht dieses 7-Tage-Probeabo nicht.
http://www.law360.com/commercialcontracts/...-s-assets-rico-suit-says
Zeitpunkt: 13.05.13 10:18
Aktion: Löschung des Beitrages
Kommentar: Regelverstoß - Beleidigend im 2. Satz
http://www.law360.com/commercialcontracts/articles/440515/ex-ceo-raided-entertainment-co-s-assets-rico-suit-says
Ex-CEO Raided Entertainment Co.'s Assets, RICO Suit SaysShare us on: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn By Linda Chiem
Law360, New York (May 10, 2013, 2:36 PM ET) -- Entertainment company ValCom Inc. launched suit in New Jersey federal court Friday accusing its ousted former president and CEO Vince Vellardita and other top brass of defrauding ValCom out of millions of shares in violation of the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act.
ValCom alleges that Vellardita and five other executives and shareholders schemed to defraud Valcom out of millions of shares and assets, engaged in self dealing and business activities that conflicted with ValCom’s business interests, such as consulting for rival entertainment companies, and usurped corporate authority for their own benefit, according to the complaint.
ValCom contends that it discovered the fraud as part of an extensive investigation into its financial records it launched after its board voted to remove Vellardita as CEO in August 2011 over his alleged repeated failures to properly fulfill his CEO duties, the complaint says.
“During the course of this lengthy investigation and based on the depth and extent of the malfeasance discovered, it became apparent that Mr. Vellardita and others acting on his behalf raided the company's assets over a period of time to serve their personal and collective financial agendas,” ValCom CEO Tim Harrington said in a statement Friday.
ValCom alleges that Vellardita for years issued stock to settle his personal obligations and unilaterally and unlawfully issued at least 131 million shares since the quarter ending June 30, 2011, without the board’s knowledge and consent.
In addition to taking out unsanctioned loans with Solomed PTE Ltd., Vellardita failed to account for more than $4.6 million in capital and expenses, wrote off $435,000 of the company’s alleged bad debts, and violated his employment agreement by serving as an officer or director for other entertainment companies while he was with ValCom, the complaint alleges.
Vellardita and his wife, Teresa, who was ValCom’s bookkeeper, also directed that payments worth nearly $200,000 be made to another entertainment company, Bridgeport Enterprises Inc. — for which Vellardita later served as CEO — purportedly for consulting work between 2007 and 2011 that the board never approved, the complaint says.
“Defendant Vince Vellardita, by engaging in conduct contrary to the best interests of ValCom, disregarded on multiple occasions his responsibility as an officer and director of the company to comply with his fiduciary responsibilities of good faith, loyalty and care by engaging in fraud, civil theft, embezzlement and fraudulent misrepresentations for personal gain ...” the complaint says.
Also named as defendants in the suit are former ValCom board director Frank O'Donnell, Teresa Vellardita, shareholders Nalinkant Rathod and Rahul Rathod, former ValCom employee Ingrid Clavijo, as well as Bridgeport Enterprises Inc.
In a statement to Law360 on Friday, Vellardita rejected ValCom’s allegations, saying the company is trying to deflect shareholders’ attention from at least three separate suits against ValCom.
“Simply not true to any of the charges for any of the parties,” he said in the statement. “Valcom refuses to let their shareholders know of three separate lawsuits filed against them for breach, defamation, copyright infringement and several other charges.”
In addition to the RICO claim, the suit asserts claims for common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, civil conspiracy and negligence, among others.
ValCom Inc. is represented by Neal H. Flaster of Neal H. Flaster LLC.
Counsel information for defendants was not immediately available Friday.
The case is ValCom Inc. v. Vincent Vellardita et al. in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. A case number was not immediately available.
Für mich hört sich alles aber nicht wirklich gut an... Klar gibt es nun eine Klage gegen Vince et al., aber es stehen ja auch immer noch diverse Klagen gegen Valcom im Raum.
Eine wichtige Frage wäre nun auch, was mit den 131mio Shares geschieht...
Hoffe, dass hier nun mal eine lebhafte Diskussion stattfinden kann. Die ersten Fakten liegen nun auf dem Tisch...
Ist die Frage was das für Klagen gegen ValCom sind und wie ernst man diese nehmen muss. VV hat bei mir jegliche Ernsthaftigkeit verloren. Und mit dieser Meinung bin ich nicht der einzige.
Das hier ist übrigens die EMail vom oben genannten Anwalt:
Vielleicht hat ja jemand Glück!
http://www.law360.com/commercialcontracts/...-s-assets-rico-suit-says
"Valcom refuses to let their shareholders know of three separate lawsuits filed against them for breach, defamation, copyright infringement and several other charges"
Die eine oder andere Klage wurde glaubig schon mal diskutiert.
Was die Klage gegen VV angeht, bin ich zuversichtlich, dass Valcom gewinnt.
Meines wissen nach hätte er nicht mehr als 250m oder 300m aktien ausgeben dürfen ohne die shareholder zu informieren.
Des weiteren wird hier aufgeführt "...Mr. Vellardita and others acting on his behalf raided the company's assets over a period of time ..."...
Also, alles in allem scheint es hier derzeit tatsächlich so auszusehen, wie es bereits einiger "basher" beschrieben hatten, dass hier einiges bereits verkauft wurde und Shares ohne Ende ausgegeben wurden... Die Frage wäre nun, inwieweit man dies rückabwickeln kann...
Kann natürlich auch sein, dass ich mich irre...
Meinungen?
was mich etwas zuversichtlich macht ist, dass TH und Co. nicht so "dumm" sein sollten und sich die Arbeit zu machen mit einem Anwalt eine solche Klageschrift auszuarbeiten. Lt. seiner Aussage sind sie Material der letzten 15 Jahre durchgegangen. Warum sollte man so etwas machen, wenn es keinerlei Chance für einen positiven Ausgange seitens Valcom geben würde. Müsste ein erfahrender Anwalt ja auch erkennen.
Das sind die neuesten 3 lawsuits die ich gefunden habe. Die hat VV vielleicht gemeint:
Copyright Infringement:
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/florida/flmdce/8:2013cv00833/282653/
https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/...4/Vellardita_v_Harrington_et_al/
Copyright Infringement:
http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/...pment-ltd-v-valcom-inc/summary/
Macropower gehört wohl irgendeinem der Rathods.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=9235943
besteht die Möglichkeit, dass man sich bei diesem Filing einfach auf eine alte Anzahl von shares verlassen hat, da man in Wirklichkeit keine Ahnung hat wieviele es gibt? Nur so ein Gedanke. Weiss nicht ob so etwas möglich ist.
schöne antwort von Tim. habe ihn auf den von mir oben geposteten Text angesprochen. insbesondere auf die aussagen von VV.
We have a a case that can't be lost we only used concrete evidence and he should just give back our stuff , the idiot should not say anything he digs deeper , but as you say crazy is not fixable it helps us Sent from my iPhone
We took it over because Vince valadita was misleading shareholders we have been spending the last six months trying to put all the pieces together and find out what we really own , we could not find someone that would audit the books to get the fillings done, we have now finally have several outside contractors and private investigators getting to the bottom of what we own , what Vince has stolen and we are looking for a good partner to sell of merge the company with , as well as file criminal charges and a lawsuits against Vince and previous board member,
Remember we are investors like you and want to find the the best opportunity for return but we needed to take the time to clean this thing up
Thanks for the Patients
Tim Harrington
Sent from my iPhone
Jeder Leser hier in diesem Thread MUSS FÜR SICH ENTSCHEIDEN, WEM UND WAS er glauben schenken will. Same as it ever was...
P.S. Das Board ist nun einmal nicht NUR Investor...