Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH)
Seite 404 von 568 Neuester Beitrag: 28.01.25 14:39 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 10.09.08 00:34 | von: Abenteurer | Anzahl Beiträge: | 15.198 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 28.01.25 14:39 | von: jacky6 | Leser gesamt: | 2.420.228 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 719 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 402 | 403 | | 405 | 406 | ... 568 > |
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Main Document:
http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1759346
Exhibit B - Summary of Unpaid Invoices:
http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1759347
Die Auseinandersetzung um DIESEN Streit-Gegenstand wird sicherlich spannend!
Sorry für den Flüchtigkeits-Fehler!
Der olle Teras.
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1760463
Wir sind jetzt für den morgigen DONNERSTAG (28.6.2012) ziemlich nah' up to Date.
Deshalb gönne ich mir hier in diesem Discussions-Faden jetzt erst 'mal eine PAUSE...
Docket #28868, 06/19/2012: Notice of Hearing on the One Hundred Seventieth Omnibus Objection to Claims (No Blocking Number LPS Claims) Solely as to Certain Claim filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. with hearing to be held on 6/28/2012 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 601 (JMP) (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1761619
Docket #29051, 06/27/2012: Notice of Agenda of Matters Scheduled for Claims Hearing on June 28, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. filed by Robert J. Lemons on behalf of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. with hearing to be held on 6/28/2012 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 601 (JMP) (Lemons, Robert).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1764890
Und danach geht es dann mit denen Gerichts-ENTSCHEIDUNGEN weiter...
Docket #29114, 06/28/2012: Order Signed on 6/28/2012 Granting Debtors Three Hundred Second Omnibus Objection to Claims (Valued Derivative Claims).
(Related Doc # [27873]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27873.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765485
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765486
(Related Doc # [27870]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27870.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765487
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765488
(Related Doc # [27867]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27867.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765490
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765491
(Related document(s) [27381]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27381.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765494
Exhibit 1: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765495
Exhibit 2: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765496
(Related Doc # [27263]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27263.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765498
Jetzt erst 'mal wieder Pause mit denen Dockets...
(Wir sind derzeit recht nah "up to Date").
(Related Doc # [27869]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27869.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765500
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765501
(Related Doc # [27866]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27866.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765511
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765512
(Related Doc # [27853]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27853.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765513
(Related Doc # [27872]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27872.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765514
Exhibit 1: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765515
Exhibit 2: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765516
(Related Doc # [27875]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27875.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765519
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27868.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765532
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765533
(Misclassified Claims). (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765545
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765546
Docket #29142, 06/29/2012: Order Signed on 6/29/2012 Granting Two Hundred Ninety-Fourth Omnibus Objection to Claims (Late-Filed Claims).
(Related Doc # [27865]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27865.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765778
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765779
(Related Doc # [27871]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27871.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765781
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765782
(Related Doc # [27874]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 27874.
Main Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765785
Exhibits: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765786
Signed on 6/29/2012 Regarding Certain Claims.
(Related document(s) [28530]) (Nulty, Lynda).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 28530.
Document: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1765787
JPMorgan Entangled in Lehman's Case
By ZACKS Equity Research:
"Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. has been constantly making efforts to evade payment claims by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Moreover, Lehman claims to get back $8.6 billion paid as collateral to JPMorgan. Therefore, Lehman has requested U.S. Bankruptcy Judge James PECK to reconsider parts of the lawsuit filed in 2010 to help it win cancellation of payment claims.
However, the Bankruptcy Court did not allow Lehman to sue JPMorgan for transactions guarded by the safe harbor laws, making the way more difficult for Lehman to proceed with its efforts. Moreover, in April 2012, the judge also dismissed part of the lawsuit, which Lehman demands to review for reinstatement.
The Story So Far
In May 2010, Lehman filed the lawsuit against the Wall Street giant, accusing it of extorting billions of dollars just before the company filed for bankruptcy, by utilizing insider information.
According to the lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York, JPMorgan had insider information about Lehman's poor financial condition. Also, being the key lender for Lehman, JPMorgan took advantage based on the condition of depriving Lehman of important clearing services unless it pays a significant amount of collateral.
Earlier in April 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) had penalized JPMorgan for its alleged involvement in the nation's biggest bankruptcy filed by Lehman. For this, JPMorgan will be paying a fine of $20 million to the CFTC. This was the first federal action taken since Lehman's downfall"...
SOURCE / LINK / QUELLE dieses Ausschnitts und des Weiterlesens dann HIER:
http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/78342/...an-entangled-in-lehmans-case
the administrator has received the claim form you submitted.you will be contacted if information or documentation is required to processed your claim. lt is not known how long it will take before claims are processed and paid.
you must notify the admimistrator in writing if you have a change of adresse. lf you have any questions regarding the litigation, you may contact the administrator at the number on the reverse side of this card.
please retain this postcarde and note of the claim number printed on the front side of this postcard for your future reference or any correspondence.
gibt es noch eine antwort oder schreib man nur wenn die anschrieft sich ändert unter der claim number ober weiter warten oder was, danke für die antwort
"seid den, 23.05 habe ich eine postkart von sincerely, claims administrator bei mir liegen". - Der Claims-Administrator heißt nicht sincerely, denn mit sincerely hat er nur unterschrieben (oder unterschreiben lassen), und das bedeutet:
Mit freundlichen Grüßen.
"gibt es noch eine antwort oder schreib man nur wenn die anschrieft sich ändert unter der claim number ober weiter warten oder was, danke für die antwort". - Man schreibt NICHT nur, wenn die Anschrift sich ändert; falls die sich aber ändern sollte, MUSST Du sofort schreiben, und zwar OHNE weitere Aufforderung, dieses zu tun.
"the administrator has received the claim form you submitted.you will be CONTACTED if information or documentation is REQUIRED to processed your claim. lt is not known how long it will take before claims are processed and paid". - Der Administrator hat das Forderungs-Formular erhalten, das Du eingesandt hast. Er wird Dich CONTACTEN, falls weitere Informationen oder Documentationen bezüglich Deiner Forderungs-Einreichung von Dir eingesandt werden müssen. Allerdings kann er jetzt noch nicht sagen, wie lange die Bearbeitung bis zur erhofften Auszahlung dauert...
Ganz liebe Grüße!
Der olle Teras.
Docket #29451, 07/17/2012: Notice of Agenda of Matters Scheduled for the Fifty-First Omnibus Hearing on July 18, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. filed by Jacqueline Marcus on behalf of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. with hearing to be held on 7/18/2012 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 601 (JMP) (Marcus, Jacqueline).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: none.
DOCUMENT: http://dm.epiq11.com/LBH/Document/GetDocument/1771236