Patriot Scientific der Highflyer 2006
ich glaube nach den Erfahrungen der letzten Jahre eher an keine weiteren News, außer es ergibt sich was aus den laufenden Prozessen
Unser Glas ist halb voll!
das mmp meiner Meinung nach gerichtlichem Urteil einer Verletzung einiges Wert!
Nur meine Meinung
Gruß
Optionen
| Boardmail an "microby" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
Ob Zocker,Daytrader oder Insider - Sie werden sich wieder auf unsere PTSC werfen.
Ich freue mich auf die nächsten 2 Monate.
Exchangeof rebuttal expert reports April 17, 2013
Expert discovery cutoff and completion May 1, 2013
Exchange of exhibit lists among the parties May 1, 2013
Submit and serve direct exhibits, with physical
and demonstrative exhibits available —
Complainant and Respondents
May 3, 2013
Submit and serve direct exhibits, with physical
and demonstrative exhibits available -- Staff
May 6, 2013
File Pre-hearing statements and briefs —
Complainant and Respondents
May 7, 2013
File objections to direct exhibits May 10, 2013
Last day to file motions in limine May 13, 2013
File Pre-hearing statement and brief —Staff May 13, 2013
File requests for receipt of evidence without a
witness
May 14, 2013
Submit and serve rebuttal exhibits, with rebuttal
physical and demonstrative exhibits available——
all parties
May 14, 2013
Deadline for third settlement conference May 17, 2013
File responses to objections to direct exhibits May 17, 2013
File objections to rebuttal exhibits May 22, 2013
Last day to file responses to motions in limine May 22, 2013
Submission of third settlement conference joint
report
May 24, 2013
File statement of high priority objections May 24, 2013
File response to objections to rebuttal exhibits May 28, 2013
File responses to statement of high priority
objections
May 29, 2013
Submission of declarations justifying
confidentiality of exhibits
May 30, 2013
Tutorials (optional) 9:00 a.m., June 3, 2013,
location TBA
Pre-hearing conference June 3, 2013, location
TBA
Hearing June 3 to June 14, 2013,
location TBA
File initial post-hearing briefs and fmal exhibit
lists
June 28, 2013
File reply post-hearing briefs July 10, 2013
Final ID due September 6, 2013
Target Date January 6, 2014
Alles beim alten!
Gruß
Optionen
| Boardmail an "microby" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
About Patriot Scientific Corporation
Headquartered in Carlsbad, California, Patriot Scientific Corporation (PTSC) is the co-owner of the Moore Microprocessor Patent Portfolio™. For more information on PTSC, visit www.ptsc.com.
Mist,
und ich hatte gehofft, daß zumindest Sierra was gezahlt hätte. Da hatten wir doch diesen schönen Vergleich und keine Kohle ist gekommen?
Was für ein Versteckspiel
ITC Klage von 2010 ? 3 Jahre ? WOW ....
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Purchases MMP
Portfolio™ License
CARLSBAD, Calif., April 24, 2013--Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTC: PTSC) announced today that Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. has purchased an MMP™ Portfolio license. Brocade is an industry leader in providing reliable, high-performance network solutions. The company's products include Enterprise Ethernet (LAN, WLAN) Switches, WAN (Internet) Routers, SAN Switches, Application Delivery Controllers, Network Security Appliances, Ethernet/Storage Network Adapters and PNY Transceivers.
About Patriot Scientific Corporation
Headquartered in Carlsbad, California, Patriot Scientific Corporation is the co-owner of the Moore Microprocessor Patent Portfolio™. For more information on PTSC, visit www.ptsc.com.
About the MMP Portfolio™
The MMP Portfolio includes US patents as well as their European and Japanese counterparts, which cover techniques that enable higher performance and lower cost designs essential to consumer and commercial digital systems ranging from PCs, cell phones and portable music players to communications infrastructure, medical equipment and automobiles.
Safe Harbor Statement: Statements herein which are not purely historical, including statements regarding Patriot Scientific Corporation's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, representations, projections, plans or predictions of the future are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the risk that the recently filed actions and litigation strategy may not be successful and the risks and uncertainties relating to the future of our MMP joint-venture. It is important to note that the company's actual results could differ materially from those in any such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties associated with the effect of changing economic conditions, trends in the products markets, variations in the company's cash flow, market acceptance risks, patent litigation, technical development risks, and seasonality. Our business could be affected by a number of other factors, including the risk factors listed from time to time in the company's SEC reports including, but not limited to, the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2012, and the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2012. The company cautions investors not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein. Patriot Scientific Corporation disclaims any obligation, and does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein.
Contact:
Patriot Investor Relations
ir@ptsc.com
760-547-2700
Wann bezahlen Intel, Apple, HC, AMD, Infineon jetzt mal ihre Lizenzgebühren,
und zwar ordentliche mit xxx-Millionenbeträgen, und nichts so Pin-ups wie bisher ?
Erleben wir das noch in diesem Jahrzehnt ?
DANKE
Optionen
| Boardmail an "Gilbertus" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
hmmm, hc kenn ich nicht und infineon ist vermutlich noch gar nicht auf dem radar.
die patent mappe ist gültig, das ist längst bekannt, siehe re-examinations uspto.
ob die industrie die patente verletzt, nun das ist in der mache, einerseits ndoc case gegen acer, htc, hier sind wird beklagte und gegenkläger, anderseits itc, hier haben wir geklagt auf verletzung und auf verbot des verkaufes der produkte der 12 firmen, u.a. amazon, samsung, barnes, acer, htc, usw.
hier beginnt der trial, die verhandlung vor gericht anfang juni 2013.
allerdings haben wir seitens der gerichte weder vom markman in dez 2012 (ndoc) noch vom märz 2013 (itc) bisher etwas offizielles gehört.
wenn die produkte der firmen die patente verletzen, ja, dann hören wir definitiv noch etwas in diesem jahrzehnt. vermutlich früher also bereits in 3-6 monaten.
Gegen 12 Firmen, u.a. Amazon, Samsung, Barnes, Acer, Htc ect. ja da sollte doch endlich
mal was gescheites gehen. Verkaufsverbote einklagen ist ja gut, aber das machen andere
Patentinhaber - eben wo das Patent bestätigt ist - dann im Eilverfahren in Form dass
eine dringenst zu erlassende vorsorgliche Verfügung zu erlassen sei, das macht denn
Patentverletzern immer sehr schnell Beine, gut bis sehr zu bezahlen. Begründung;
Weil der Verdienstausfall bei Verkaufsstopp ein vielfaches ausmachen würde.
Da gibt es auch Präjudizfälle genug. PTSC hat doch gute Annwälte, oder nicht ?
Dann sind wir als wieder vertröstet auf September 2012.
Also dann
Optionen
| Boardmail an "Gilbertus" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
die patente sind gültig und sogar mehrfach bestätigt, seitens der uspto, der us patentbehörde.
was noch nicht bestätigt ist durch einen zuende geführten trial ist, verletzen denn die produkte von htc, acer, samsung etc. die patente, DIESER beweis wird nun geführt bei der itc mit dem ziel verkausstop. nachfolgend dann ndoc acer, htc um den schaden materiell zu bemessen.
wenn itc gewonnen ist, dann hat dein szenario gültigkeit, wenn dann ndoc gewonnen ist, dann gibt es auch dazu noch klarheit zu den summen.
Optionen
| Boardmail an "Gilbertus" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
....the four cores are also clocked asynchronously for better power management....
wenn ich dies richtig verstehe, dann bestätigt Qualcom endlich einen wesentlichen Teil des 336 nunmehr. Hmmm,....!!?
http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/...s/1796962#message
na hoffentlich heben wir uns diesen Brocken für eine Lizenz mit xxx mill usd auf, also nach einem Gerichtsurteil das besagt, das alles was nach Fish & Moore gebaut ist, das MMP verletzt!
allerdings ist ja auch qcom genau wie apple quasi Nachbar! da beschleicht mich allerdings schon wieder das Nachbarschafts Deal - Ami - Industrie Rabatt Gefühl
Viele Grüße
microby
PS: Mai und Juni werden hart für die Bearbeiter des ITC Prozedere
Optionen
| Boardmail an "microby" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
Here are my notes from the ASM:
Not more than 30 -35 people were in attendance. All 4 motions passed and the general meeting adjourned after about 20 minutes. Jim Otteson and Vincent from Agility Law were there and Jim spoke and answered questions mostly surrounding our current ITC litigation. below are some of the salient points:
· Agility is taking the case on contingency and would not be doing so if he did not feel very confident about the MMP
· Jim Otteson said that we emerged from the USPTO stronger than when we went in
· the 336 is Jim's favorite patent in the portfolio & our most valuable asset
· by Jim's account, we won 9 of the 10 claims
· we should here within the next 2 weeks if the Motion for summary determination will be struck down
· the case is slated to be heard before the ITC on June 3rd in D.C.
· We will see the results on the first week in September with final order to be enforced 1/6/14
· The Stay in the NDOC for September 23 should be lifted within a couple weeks
· we are not touting any Markman victories in order not to upset the litigation process
· Agility has 16 or so attorneys or 90% of his firm working the MMP
· According to Dan Leckrone the opposition had 55 attorney's at the last court hearing who represent the most prestigious IP law firms in the world
· there should be no issue proving "domestic industry" in the case
· Jim mentioned that Judge Grewal was formerly a patent litigator in Silicon Valley
Dan Leckrone went on to say that is important to understand the magnitude & effort Agility brings to the prosecution of the MMP portfolio as well as their experience. My take away was that we are in good well-seasoned hands and Agility is the best in the business. All told, the meeting was generally positive and once we overcome the Motion for summary determination we have a strong chance in obtaining an exclusion order for importation of infringing products. Once we achieve this, it gives us much more leverage in negotiations with alleged infringer. Still optimistic kw
posted on May 01, 13 12:11PM (Log in to use the IP Check tool) [?]
I have been a shareholder since 1994, this is the second time I attended the SHM.
Although I spoke with Cliff Flowers a few months ago, and meeting him yesterday confirmed that he is a conservative individual, who measures his words, as well as his actions. IMHO he is great for the task he has a head of him.
Speaking with Gloria, PTSC has great plans for the future but of course there is only so much she can say and stay within the law.
Did not get a chance to meet with Carl Johnson, seem like a nice person.
I had a chance to speak with Dan Leckrone, you can tell that he "commands authority" and carries a "big stick".
I had a question concerning the future of the MMP after the life of the patent ends and much to my dismay he was brutally honest, “assuming we win not much”, he implied WIN is going to be huge, but that there would be other major opportunities for PTSC continuance into the future.
Me.... being an optimist, was kind of dismayed, while many here on many times warned of the same outcome that Dan L. stated, I had always hoped that there would be some way to revive the patents, extend the life of the patents and that is clearly not going to happen after speaking with Dan and Cliff.
However Dan mentioned that there are BIG things coming our way, more opportunities for shareholder value that are in the works that will cause PTSC to continue prospering into the future, while this may give
Dan gave me the impression that he is completely at ease with the PTSC TPL relationship, there seems to be a strong unity between both, imho like mindedness is good for all companies, that there be no division, or strife.
My speculation: Possible Merger in the future? Possible acquisition of more patent portfolios? Continuous of enforcing bullet proof patents? Divies to come?
But for long term sustainability, we need a solid long term Business Plan otherwise many will bail out and never return.
I know many may hate this since it did not work well in the past: More acquisitions of companies? An old saying: If at first you do not succeed, try…try again. The idea is a good one but I think the BOD has learned many costly lessons that they will not repeat again.
Who knows for sure, but after the expected win, I think that the PTSC BOD needs to present a 5 Year business plan outlining how they will increase shareholder value, how the company is expected to grow after the patents expire.
I suppose with Billions in the Bank (I hope) they will be able then do what they could not do before being tied up in litigation.
IMHO with the Proper Court Wins: With the news media informing the world how a tiny company was able to defeat the World’s Best Patent Defense Attorney firms and win big, how a tiny company was kept from success due to patent theft as well as suppressed due to the constant patent reexamination requests made by the infringers, is going to make a BIG Well Known Name for PTSC worldwide and for a business Brand Name Recognition is a must, I trust we will have that.
My Hopes: That the world’s investors want to buy in creating an upsurge in demand for the stock and the stock can only go up, that is if all goes well with the News Media