Seite 1 von 307
Neuester Beitrag: 28.02.20 18:21
|Eröffnet am:||02.05.17 17:36||von: mad-jay||Anzahl Beiträge:||8.67|
|Neuester Beitrag:||28.02.20 18:21||von: Mogli3||Leser gesamt:||1.129.714|
|Seite: < 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 305 | 306 | 307 307 >|
Frage an Bull bzgl. MS :
The results were taken from the Potter paper, so I think it is procolon 1.0.
Procolon 2.0 has better results. Why was 2.0 not used for the microsimulation ?
Antwort Bull :
The difference between 1.0 and 2.0 are improvements in the reagents, magnetic beads, and process.
The main difference between the CE/EU product and US is the interpretation. Epi proColon is performed on real time PCR in triplicate. In CE/EU product, a positive patient test is when 2 of the 3 are positive. In US product, a positive patient test is when 1 of the 3 are positive.
The microsimulation was requested from the American Cancer Society – thus, we used the performance from the US version of the test for the model. This data will be used to influence US Medicare and guidelines/societies.
Attached goes into more detail regarding the different versions of the test and the respective performance.