2 Milliarden $: Patriot Scientific gegen intel
Seite 25 von 136 Neuester Beitrag: 25.04.21 03:01 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 18.03.04 14:29 | von: aida73 | Anzahl Beiträge: | 4.387 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 25.04.21 03:01 | von: Silkelwtpa | Leser gesamt: | 325.010 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 46 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 22 | 23 | 24 | | 26 | 27 | 28 | ... 136 > |
3 Order´s für zusammen 3.790,-€ machen noch keinen Silberstreif am Horizont.
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP. Registered Shares DL -,00001
Börse: Frankfurt
Datum: 16.12.04
Tickliste
Zeit Kurs Volumen
13:10:30 0,062 1500
12:05:51 0,062 40000
12:00:13 0,057 25000
09:15:08 G 0,050 0
Hoffen wir mal auf noch bessere Zeiten
Level II Quotebook
Time MMID Size Bid
13:28 DATA 100 0.090 ↑
13:28 DOMS 50 0.090 ↑
13:28 BWNC 50 0.090 ↑
13:25 GNET 100 0.087 ↑
13:03 JEFF 50 0.085 ↑
13:11 GVRC 50 0.085 ↑
13:14 NITE 50 0.085
13:25 SCHB 50 0.085
13:17 TDCM 50 0.082 ↑
13:15 PUGS 50 0.080
13:16 HILL 50 0.080 ↑
12:49 FLCR 50 0.078 ↑
13:20 PERT 50 0.078 ↑
13:16 VIEW 50 0.077 ↓
12:59 GNLN 50 0.070 ↑
13:02 WDCO 50 0.069
07:30 SACM 50 0.065
07:30 VFIN 50 0.065
13:02 BAMM 50 0.061
13:14 FRAN 50 0.061
07:30 EFGI 50 0.060
07:30 SBSH 50 0.060
07:30 HDSN 50 0.060
07:30 VERT 50 0.060
07:56 BEST 50 0.060 ↓
07:30 MRLN 50 0.058
07:30 CRWN 50 0.055
07:30 JPTC 50 0.040
07:30 VNDM 50 0.020
07:30 BMIC 50 0.018
Ask Size MMID Time
0.093 50 TDCM 13:17
↓ 0.094 50 PUGS 13:15
↑ 0.094 50 SCHB 13:25
↓ 0.095 50 FRAN 13:14
↓ 0.095 50 NITE 13:14
0.100 50 VFIN 07:30
0.100 50 VERT 07:30
0.100 50 FLCR 12:49
0.100 50 GNLN 12:59
0.100 50 GVRC 13:11
0.100 50 HILL 13:16
0.108 50 MRLN 07:30
0.110 50 EFGI 07:30
0.110 50 HDSN 07:30
0.110 50 DOMS 13:28
0.117 50 CRWN 07:30
0.119 50 VIEW 13:16
0.120 50 JPTC 07:30
↑ 0.120 50 JEFF 13:03
0.121 50 SACM 07:30
0.130 50 BWNC 13:28
↓ 0.150 50 BEST 07:56
0.155 50 PERT 13:20
0.169 50 BMIC 07:30
↑ 0.170 50 BAMM 13:02
0.180 50 SBSH 07:30
0.200 50 VNDM 07:30
0.000 0 GNET 13:25
0.000 0 DATA 13:28
Time & Sales
Price Size Time
↑ 0.090 11000 13:25:08
0.086 1000 13:17:44
↓ 0.086 7000 13:16:54
0.087 10000 13:16:24
↓ 0.087 10000 13:16:20
0.090 10000 13:15:49
0.090 5000 13:15:37
↓ 0.090 5000 13:15:21
0.095 5000 13:15:13
0.095 2500 13:14:52
0.095 20000 13:13:33
↓ 0.095 50000 13:13:28
0.096 5000 13:12:47
↓ 0.096 50000 13:12:22
0.097 50000 13:12:16
↓ 0.097 15000 13:12:14
↑ 0.098 5000 13:12:00
0.097 10000 13:11:40
0.097 2000 13:11:36
0.097 25000 13:11:36
0.097 2000 13:10:57
↑ 0.097 6000 13:10:40
↑ 0.096 6000 13:10:37
↑ 0.095 5000 13:09:14
↓ 0.093 19000 13:09:08
0.099 5000 13:08:54
0.099 30000 13:08:54
↑ 0.099 30000 13:08:40
0.093 5000 13:08:35
0.093 1000 13:08:35
I just recently called and talked with PTSC. I won’t say the person name because I forgot to ask him if it was ok for me to do so, but don’t just believe me, call the company to confirm what I am about to say below to if it is consistent. He told me that they are seeking royalties for their patented technology that was infringed upon by Intel.
I was told by the company that their patented technology applies to every single chip that Intel has sold that is in excess of 120 mega hertz. I was told that this includes every chip that Intel has ever sold since 1998 forward until now to include the ones they are still selling.
Everything originated from PTSC going after 5 Japanese companies as customers of Intel from infringing on PTSC’s patented technology. The 5 Japanese companies pretty much said to leave them out of the patent infringement because these chips were sold to them from Intel and told PTSC to take this issue up with Intel and not with them. Intel has since low balled PTSC to send a subsidiary affiliate to try to coordinate a low end deal. It was not accepted.
He referenced me to an old PR where in Nov 05 below to show me how much they believe would be fair compensation for royalties that have not been paid by Intel since the inception of the patented technology.
Please read and understand this PR below:
http://www.knobias.com/individual/public/...7e82c74fc1f1f90867fe95a60
Pay particular attention to the piece where PTSC states:
“The company estimates the value to exceed $1 billion.”
From doing some quick math:
** OS = 198,148,707 shares
** PTSC believes $1 Billion is the value on the short end
Then…
$1,000,000,000 ÷ 198,148,707 = $5.04+
This means that PTSC believes that the value of their U.S. Patent # 5,809,336, High Performance Microprocessor Having Variable Speed System Clock, and this patent alone is worth in excess of $5.04 cents.
Intel does not want this to go to court. PTSC has the proof and they are confident they can deliver which is why they already have their case numbers for their scheduled court sessions to take Intel to court.
They have the proof and I recommend just reading this PR below to get a better understanding and more information on the patent and how they learned that they their claims of Intel infringing on their patent is valid:
http://www.knobias.com/individual/public/...01d9d814556052ab1c6ca7c21
Again, none of us know what the outcome will be with PTSC versus Intel, but it looks like the odds are in our favor to receive back pay on royalties in a huge amount for them to settle out of court. Even if they settle for half of what they believe the patents to be worth, that puts the value of the patent to be at $2.52 for fair compensation for the buying of that patent alone, not the company.
At these levels, I think that PTSC is seriously undervalued. In my opinion it’s not a matter of if, but instead it’s a matter of when. I hope this helps. Please call the company and confirm what I posted above with PTSC to make your own decision.
All is well!
http://www.sterlingsclass.com/
;-)
Sterling
Ich weiß nicht, ob da heute schon mit einer positiven Entscheidung, die den Kurs nachhaltig beflügelt, zu rechnen ist.
greetz joker
P.S.
Hoffentlich war das nicht nur wildes getaxe durch die MM's und heute kommt das Gegenteil,weil nichts konkretes entschieden wird.
der prozess kann sich doch noch jahre hinziehen...
ich interessiere mich auch für den wert, bin mir aber noch nicht ganz schlüssig bei wieviel ich einsteigen soll.
ich hoffe ja, dass der wert nochmal unter die 5 cent-marke fällt.
mfg ds
![](http://www.ariva.de//board/pneditor/images/em.icon.cool.gif)
also ich weiß net so recht...
ersten will ich nich unter 0,5 rein sondern unter 0,05 *g*
und zweitens bin ich mir noch net ganz sicher... ein unternehmen mit 8 mitarbeitern und 198,148,707 aktien?
und ihr kennt ja die justiz in den usa... so'n prozess kann sich locker über 5-10 jahren hinziehen.
mfg ds
![](http://www.ariva.de//board/pneditor/images/em.icon.cool.gif)
Im Übrigen gehe ich von einer Entscheidung innerhalb der nächsten 1 bis 3 Jahre aus - eine Rendite vonn 1000 bis 2000 Prozent auf 3 Jahre ist doch nicht schlecht oder ? *g* Hast Du´s etwa eilig? Ich sage hier auch jedem, hier nur Geld investieren, was die nächste Zeit nicht gebraucht wird und "übrig" ist. Wenn alles klappt und ich weiterhin jährlich ca. 5.000 Euronen auf diesem Kursniveau investiere (nur was halt so aus anderer Investis übrig bleibt), und PTSC in 3 Jahren auf 1,- Euro bzw. 1,33 Dollar (nach momentanem $/€ Kurs) schießt, das lohnt sich doch...
15.000 Restgeld investieren +1.000% = 165.000 rausholen ist doch ´n geiler Anreiz...
*g*
hast du ja in der vergangenheit schon öfters bewiesen.
aber ich würd gern noch jokers meinung zu dem wert hören... was meinst du dazu??
du bist doch schon investiert oder??
gruß daniel
IGNITE 2FX Excels at EEMBC Consumer Benchmark
Tested against the EEMBC Consumer benchmark suite in a 600-MHz simulation, the IGNITETM 2FX achieved an out-of-the-box ConsumermarkTM score of .01808 per MHz, making it the highest scoring certified out-of-the-box score on a per-gate basis for any general-purpose processor to date. "The IGNITE 2FX Consumermark scores are remarkable in that this level of processing performance can be delivered by such a small number of physical gates without relying on cache or external resources," said Markus Levy, EEMBC president.
What is EEMBC?
EEMBC (pronounced "embassy"), the Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium, develops and certifies real-world benchmarks and benchmark scores to help designers select the right embedded processors for their systems. Every processor submitted for EEMBC® benchmarking is tested for parameters representing different workloads and capabilities in communications, networking, consumer, office automation, automotive/industrial, embedded Java, and microcontroller-related applications. With members including leading semiconductor, intellectual property, and compiler companies, EEMBC establishes benchmark standards and provides certified benchmarking results through the EEMBC Certification Labs (ECL) in Texas and California.
What is a Consumermark score?
A processor's ConsumermarkTM score is a measure of its overall performance on a set of five digital-imaging programs, which comprise version 1.1 of the EEMBC Consumer benchmark:
The Consumermark score is the geometric mean of the individual scores for these five benchmarks, divided by a normalization factor. Click here for a detailed score report on the IGNITE 2FX from the EEMBC web site. - used in front-end processing of digital still cameras - emphasizes 2-dimensional array access and multiply/accumulate capability
- used for encoding still images - emphasizes integer math with diverse operand types and memory accesses
- used for decoding still images - emphasizes integer math with diverse operand types and memory accesses
- used in color printers and other digital-imaging products - emphasizes basic arithmetic and minimum-value detection capability
- used in NTSC encoders - emphasizes multiply/accumulate capability
Unrivaled Performance Density
The hybrid architecture of the IGNITE 2FX combines the inherent advantages of RISC and stack architectures to yield a processor that consistently delivers the highest performance density in a variety of applications.
Performance density is a measure of a processor's performance per unit of phsyical space (i.e., the amount of silicon it occupies). Performance is typically expressed in terms of a benchmark score or other standard processing metric (e.g., MFLOPS); physical space is expressed in terms of chip area or physical gates. This metric is critical when selecting a processor for applications that have strict space, cost, or power-consumption requirements.
Table 1 shows the performance density for each general-purpose processor with a certified out-of-the-box Consumermark score in a simulated environment. The performance density for each has been computed from the published scores and processor configurations at the EEMBC web site. The results have been computed with and without on-chip memory, if any, to illustrate the impact of its use on performance density. here for further details on the computation of processor area. -->
![EEMBC Consumermark: Performance Density](http://www.ptsc.com/images/performance_density.jpg)
Table 1. The IGNITE 2FX has unrivaled performance density on EEMBC's Consumer benchmark [details]
The philosophy behind the design of the IGNITE 2FX is one of simplicity. Its streamlined architecture has no pipelines, and requires no cache or on-chip memory to perform efficiently. This makes it ideal for applications that place a premium on cost and power-consumption considerations.
INFLAME Architecture
But the simplicity and small size of the IGNITE 2FX also provide it with scalability. This means that its performance can be scaled upward to satisfy applications with greater computational demands.
The INFLAME is a SIMD architecture, employing multiple instances of the IGNITE 2FX in a single chip. Because of the unmatched performance density of the IGNITE 2FX, the INFLAME can outperform its competition in a smaller area.
![INFLAME Architecture: 3x3 IGNITE Array](http://www.ptsc.com/images/inflame.jpg)
Figure 1. The INFLAME Architecture employs multiple instances of the IGNITE 2FX
When an application's algorithms are scalable in a SIMD environment, such as those used in digital-imaging products, the INFLAME architecture can deliver outstanding performance. As shown in Figure 1, the 9-instance version of the INFLAME has demonstrated performance in excess of 7 times a single IGNITE 2FX for a variety of digital-imaging algorithms.
Table 1 Notes: Ich denke man kann von denen noch einiges erwarten,auch wenn sich der Prozeß noch hinziehen sollte. Man muss nur den richtigen Einstieg finden.Rückschläge sind natürlich besonders heftig wenn etwas negatives bzgl. des Prozeßes veröffentlicht wird. Wie immer ein high risk mit guten Aussichten,aber auch enormen Rückschlagpotenzial. greetz joker
EMA50 kreuzt von unten nach oben!!
Wie im Februar?????? Blaue Kästchen!
Weihnachten steht vor der Tür!