1ST NRG Corp
Seite 2 von 47 Neuester Beitrag: 24.04.21 23:13 | ||||
| Eröffnet am: | 07.03.13 19:06 | von: 2brix2 | Anzahl Beiträge: | 2.159 |
| Neuester Beitrag: | 24.04.21 23:13 | von: Brigitteszuaa | Leser gesamt: | 110.916 |
| Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 9 | |
| Bewertet mit: |  | |||
| Seite: < 1 | | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... 47 > | ||||
cmf bullische tendenz aber noch unter der null linie, wir also ist positive laufen. das heißt mehr geld fliesst in die aktie
MACD auch noch im minus, wird ins positive laufen.
RSI noch unter 50 ab 50% ist er bullisch und wird bis min 80%-90% laufen denke ich
das wird ein run meiner meinung nach
14 Day RSI at 80% | 0.0203 | |
0.0179 | Price Crosses 9-40 Day Moving Average | |
13 Week High | 0.0170 | |
14 Day RSI at 70% | 0.0114 | |
0.0111 | 38.2% Retracement from 13 Week High | |
0.0093 | 50% Retracement from 13 Week High/Low | |
0.0080 | Price Crosses 40 Day Moving Average Stalls | |
0.0074 | 38.2% Retracement from 13 Week Low | |
4 Week High | 0.0050 | |
Pivot Point 2nd Level Resistance | 0.0047 | |
0.0042 | 14 Day RSI at 50% |
RSI 80% bei 0,02 cent, statt aktueller kurs 0,0039 das wäre der hammer, wenn es so läuft
sc.png (verkleinert auf 72%)
mehr käufe als verkäufe heute und sogar mit plus ins lange WE
was will man mehr :)
p.gif
RSI nun51 % und bullische
kurs kurs zieht das bollingerband nach oben, ema 20 immer noch unter ema 50 kreuzen sich diese gibt es ein run
MACD noch nicht im plus und bullisch
Short Term Indicators Average: 60% Buy
Medium Term Indicators Average: 25% Sell
Long Term Indicators Average: 67% Sell
Overall Average: 8% Sell
Overall Short Intermediate Long
Neutral (-0.22) Bearish (-0.36) Neutral (-0.11) Neutral (-0.19)
Recent CandleStick Analysis
Very Bearish
Date Candle
Mar-28-2013 Bearish Doji Star
Mar-26-2013 Bearish Engulfing
Mar-25-2013 Bullish Engulfing
Mar-22-2013 Hammer
Read more at http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/...&mode=stock#DywkM13fZP3qbYkJ.99
irgendwer kauft die baerischen szenarien
sc.png (verkleinert auf 72%)
montag gehts erst wieder los. ich bin gespannt
1-2 uscent könnten drin sein 
je nach newslage vllt sogar mehr
on balance springt wieder nach oben, es geht ordentlich kapital rein in die aktie
gehts auf tagesschluss über die ema 50 bei 0,0048 kommt noch mal schwung rein
allen schöne ostern
vielen Dank für deine interassanten Posts und Charts.
Bin natürlich noch dabei...wurmt mich aber immer noch, dass ich nicht nachgkauft habe...
Optionen
| Boardmail an "2brix2" |
Wertpapier: 1st NRG |
Book value as of September 2012 (assets-liabilities) of $11M with a current 243M O/S or .045 PPS
then,
Page 8 shows a $14.5M investment, converted in September 2012 at .32 PPS
http://www.otcmarkets.com/...ialReportViewer?symbol=FNRC&id=96868
Company tells me there are no royalties for that $14M either, just 44M common shares
interessantes post... hab ich jetzt erst gesehen
rechne ich also mit, ich nehm sogar mal 500 Mio aktien, die im lauf sind, sein könnten
wäre das immer noch 0,028 uscent statt mit den 243 mio gerechnet von dem herren oben aus ihub.. ich rechne lieber mit mehr aktien als zu wenig
aber ca. 0,03 uscent, ich habs nicht dagegen :)
die haben eine 7 Mio Kreditlinie ... nicht schlecht für so eine kleine bude, dann dürfte die dilution ja bald beendet sein, denn cash haben sie ja :)
http://www.otcmarkets.com/...ialReportViewer?symbol=FNRC&id=96868
das short volumen
Historical Short Selling Data For FNRC
| Date | VolShorted | High | Low | Close | Chg | ShortVol | RegularVol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28 | 23.19% | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 14,046,867 | 60,578,748 |
| Mar 27 | 30.46% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 11,810,230 | 38,777,540 |
| Mar 26 | 24.96% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 16,739,029 | 67,075,580 |
| Mar 25 | 42.40% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 32,338,009 | 76,273,874 |
By kingPennyStocks.com
on 29/03/2013
Massapequa Park – March 29, 2013 — (Net PR News) -King Penny Stocks is an elite financial community for investors and traders alike who are looking to potentially gain financial freedom through the markets on undervalued companies and “in-play” momentum penny stocks. Today, we bring a special trend analysis of the following stocks: 1st NRG Corp.(PINK:FNRC), Journal of Radiology Inc (OTC:JRRD), Federal National Mortgage Association(OTC:FNMA), Ambac Financial Group, Inc.(PINK:ABKFQ)
PLUS you’ll get KingPennyStock’s Pro Trading Rules Mini E-book absolutely FREE! Claim Your Copy
1st NRG Corp. (PINK:FNRC) stock moved up+10.26% and finished the day at $0.0043. The day started out with a higher opening price of $0.0057, versus its prior close of $0.0039.
The company traded with the total volume of 60.58 million shares, while its average trading volume remained 10.69 million shares. The beta of FNRC stands at -20.51.
Have a look at the company’s graph: During the last 5 trades the stock jumped almost +90.91%. During the last one month it rose with the percentage of +31.25. Its year to date performance remained adverse -60%. 1st NRG Corp., an independent energy company, engages in the exploration, development, and production of natural gas properties in the United States.
jetzt kommte noch ein ami push dazu ;)
http://netprnews.com/...ssociation-ambac-financial-group-inc/1216484/
Share Structure
Market Value1 $1,048,868 a/o Mar 28, 2013
Shares Outstanding 243,922,872 a/o Mar 18, 2013
Float 69,861,443 a/o Mar 18, 2013
das bei 17 mio asset
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FNRC/company-info
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY 17,359,754
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=FNRC&…
eigentlich müsste die MK bei 17.080.000 bei dem float noch höher
ist aber nur bei 1 mio, jemand eine Erklärung? bin neugierig
viel zu niedrig, Erklärungen??
then,another major development: October 29, 2012
1st NRG Corp closed a transaction with nine qualified investors in January 2011, pursuant to which the Investors purchased a private placement of Units consisting of Preferred Shares which have been converted into 44,926,902 Common Shares together with Warrants to purchase additional Common Shares. The total Unit purchase was $14,452,014.45 (16,057.79 per Unit or $0.322 per converted Common Share) and is currently reflected on the Company’s Balance Sheet as restricted cash. Under the terms of the Unit Subscription Agreement (USA), the Investor’s cash and the converted Common Shares are held in a restricted account with an Intermediary where an Account Management Agreement (AMA) between the Investors, the Company and the Intermediary governs the release of funds to the Company from the restricted account.
The AMA provides that the “Breakout” of funds from the restricted account to the Company can be released to the Company in 36 periodic installments pursuant to the AMA schedule which was approved by the Company and the Investors. Trading volumes at or above a minimum bid price will release a percentage of each periodic “Breakout” funds to the Company and Common Shares to the Investors.
Management Comments
Mr. Kevin Norris, CEO said “The ability of the Company to access the $14 million dollars coupled with the previously announced $7 million dollar credit facility will enhance development on its core properties in the Powder River Basin, the Utica Shale in Ohio and the Niobrara Shale in Nebraska.” Mr. Norris went on to say “these funds will also enable the Company to evaluate and acquire other properties as we work to grow the Company.”
"a transaction at $0.322 with nine qualified investors" FNRC is more than a gold mine or a Platinum mine.
“This is the best treasure of American energy,” McClendon said on CNBC’s Mad Money hosted by Jim Cramer http://www.cnbc.com/id/49468542.
skies the limit here.
October 29, 2012:
Mr. Kevin Norris, CEO said “The ability of the Company to access the $14 million dollars coupled with the previously announced $7 million dollar credit facility will enhance development on its core properties in the Powder River Basin, the Utica Shale in Ohio and the Niobrara Shale in Nebraska.” Mr. Norris went on to say “these funds will also enable the Company to evaluate and acquire other properties as we work to grow the Company.”
Is Utica the next big shale opportunity?
Facebook | Twitter | Email | Instapaper
By Edward McAllister, Reuters
Monday, Mar. 25, 2013
Rig hands use clamps to attach a new piece of pipe as they stand on the platform of oil Service Rig 5 on the Killbarker Construction site in Knox County, Ohio Ty Wright/Bloomberg
Shares of Gulfport Energy were in free fall last spring, dropping 55% in four months, until the oil and gas producer announced it had drilled its first three wells in the Utica shale formation in Ohio.
The Oklahoma-based company’s value has since more than doubled, bolstered by a series of company production updates on those and a handful of other new wells located in what many believe to be the next frontier in America’s oil and gas revolution.
The share price gain represents perhaps the clearest example of how investors, giddy about an expected boom in Ohio’s energy production, have been betting on companies based on some optimistic, but preliminary, production data.
But next month a more comprehensive state report will publish new data from Ohio’s oil and gas wells that will offer the most insight yet about whether the Utica is the next big thing or a potentially fizzling bust for companies operating there.
Energy producers in the Buckeye State have compared the Utica to the giant Eagle Ford shale play in Texas and declared it a boon for a state still weathering an economic downturn. However, enthusiasm has cooled somewhat since drilling began in 2011, after wells produced more cheap natural gas than the more lucrative oil.
On March 31 this year, data from between 50 and 60 wells drilled in 2012 will be given to the state. It will then be made available on the Ohio Department of Natural Resources’ website in April, the department said. It did not give a specific date but last year the report came on the second of the month.
While around 500 drilling permits have been issued in the state since 2011, only those wells that have actually produced will be covered in the report. It will show output over the lifetime of every new well, its location, and its owner, providing some proof of which acreage, and which companies, are performing best.
“It is a meaningful sample of wells that will go a long way toward giving investors a sense of whether the Utica is the next big thing,” said Morningstar analyst Mark Hanson, who covers companies operating in the state.
UTICA SILENCE
Ohio publishes well data only once a year, making it one of the least transparent states in reporting energy output. Most states publish every quarter. On April 2 last year, production was published from just five wells. That is the only official state record on the play two years after drilling began there.
Results from the five wells drilled by Chesapeake Energy in Carroll and Harrison counties showed lower than expected oil production, and stronger natural gas output, the state report said.
Since then, a long list of companies, including Britain’s BP , Anadarko Petroleum and Hess Corp, have acquired acreage in Ohio. Most remain quiet about their progress for fear that it will push lease prices higher.
“It has to do with the competitive nature of things,” said Mark Houser, chief executive officer of EV Energy Partners which, together with its parent company Enervest Ltd, owns more than 800,000 acres in the Utica. “If you have a good acreage position, you still may want to buy the acre next door. You don’t want to have everything public.”
BP, Anadarko and Hess did not respond to request for comment for this story.
Devon Energy is in the process of selling more than 200,000 acres in the Utica after drilling a series of what a company spokesman described as “disappointing” wells in what it expected to be oil-producing acreage. Chesapeake Energy, which did not immediately respond to calls for comment, has also sold off a portion of its more than 1 million acres there.
“The little I have seen from the Utica shows it has been a bit disappointing given the expectations,” said Phil Weiss, an analyst with Argus Research who covers companies drilling there. “Given that the amount of information is relatively sparse, people will be paying attention.”
PEAK RATE, SHAKE AND BAKE
Meanwhile, smaller companies such as Gulfport, Rex Energy and Magnum Hunter Resources, with a proportionately bigger stake in the Utica, have more to lose if the play turns out to be a dud.
Rex Energy and Magnum Hunter did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Of the smaller companies, Gulfport’s share price has shown the most remarkable rise since the first half of last year and the company in many ways encapsulates both the hype about the Utica and the difficulty in deciphering its true potential.
Since June, 2012, when it announced it had drilled its first three Utica wells, Gulfport’s share price has risen 156%, from below $17 to more than $43 on March 18, as the company began reporting initial flow rates from the new wells.
But as the April deadline for reporting well production looms, experts will be watching closely for whether Gulfport’s preliminary data holds up to further scrutiny.
“Ultimately, the production and estimated ultimate recovery of our wells and those of our peers will provide definitive answers,” said Paul Heerwagen, Gulfport’s director of investor relations.
The company, which owns 128,000 net acres in the Utica, published impressive “peak rates” of gas and condensates from its Utica wells, a measurement of initial flows taken over a limited time period, usually no longer than 24 hours. A peak rate is typically much higher than eventual longer term output that declines over time.
“The peak rate is more a bragging type thing,” said Randall Collum, a natural gas production analyst at data provider Genscape. “It is nice to know and gives some indication of potential production, but I would rather get a longer term outlook.”
During a quarterly conference call with analysts on Feb 27, Gulfport chief executive James Palm revealed longer term rates for two wells, which had fallen off significantly from the first flows.
Natural gas output from the Wagner 1-28H well fell from a peak rate of 17.1 million cubic feet per day reported on August 7 to an average of 5.2 million cubic feet per day after 129 days of production. Output of gas condensates fell from 432 barrels per day to 94 bpd.
Decline rates are normal, and Gulfport executives said on Feb. 27 that output from the Wagner well has increased slightly since the end of the year.
Gulfport is not alone in reporting peak rates. Rex Energy chief executive Tom Stabley said he was “very excited” about output from three new Utica wells in a statement on March 18 that disclosed 24-hour test rates for the wells.
But the speed of the declines in the Gulfport wells, and the scarcity of longer term data, makes it hard for investors to judge whether it will be a good long-term investment.
“The first four months show that the peak rate was not over-representative of what could ultimately be recovered from the well,” said Morningstar’s Hanson.
Further muddying the water is a new technique known in the industry as ‘shake and bake’ or ‘resting’, where a well is plugged for a number of days or months after drilling to increase pressure in the well. Shake and bake, an unproven method that companies hope might improve recovery from a well over its lifetime, can increase initial flows by raising pressure, said Gulfport’s Heerwagen, though it is not yet clear if it increases flows long term.
So far, more than 500 well permits have been issued in the Utica since 2011, many of which are expected to begin producing as new pipelines and processing plants are built to connect wells to markets as early as this spring.
As more wells are drilled, more information will be made available– but not for a while. The data on wells drilled in 2013 will remain largely unknown until April 2014.
http://www.financialpost.com/m/wp/news/energy/blog.html?b=bu…
Market Value1 $1,268,399 a/o Apr 01, 2013
Shares Outstanding 243,922,872 a/o Mar 18, 2013
Float 69,861,443 a/o Mar 18, 2013
Authorized Shares 500,000,000 a/o Dec 31, 2012
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) 2012 10,649,668 2011 (2,977,955)
neues filling ist draußen
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FNRC/filings
Cash Flow Used by Investing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had cash used by investing activities of $14,443,694 and $12,611, respectively. In 2011, we incurred additional capital costs finishing up wells drilled in the fourth quarter of 2010. In 2012, $14,443,014 was reclassified from the equity section of our balance sheet to Other Assets – Restricted Cash.
Our capital budget may be adjusted as business conditions warrant. The amount, timing and allocation of capital expenditures is largely discretionary and within our control. If natural gas decline to levels below our acceptable levels or costs increase to levels above our acceptable levels, we could choose to defer a significant portion of our budgeted capital expenditures until later periods to achieve the desired balance between sources anduses of liquidity and prioritize capital projects that we believe have the highest expected returns and potential to generate near-term cash flow. We routinely monitor and adjust our capital expenditures in response to changes in prices, availability of financing, drilling and acquisition costs, industry conditions, the timing of regulatory approvals, the availability of rigs, success or lack of success in drilling activities, contractual obligations, internally generated cash flow and other factors both within and outside our control.
RSI erst bei 57 bis 80 oder gar 100 ist viel luft ;)
RSI 80 bei 0,0172 man dann los
MACD immer noch nicht bullisch so wie es aussieht
OBV weiter steigend, daten von heut fehlen noch
cmf immer noch unter der nulllinie daten von heuten fehlen mir noch
Parabolic sar abstände nach oben, bekommen größrer lücken, besteht ein sprung bevor?
Short Term Indicators Average: 60% Buy
Medium Term Indicators Average: 25% Buy
Long Term Indicators Average: 67% Sell, eine frage der zeit bis der buy wechsel kommt
Overall Average: 8% Buy
sc.png (verkleinert auf 72%)
52 Week High | 0.5800 | |
0.3590 | 38.2% Retracement from 52 Week High | |
0.2907 | 50% Retracement from 52 Week High/Low | |
0.2225 | 38.2% Retracement from 52 Week Low | |
0.0314 | Price Crosses 18-40 Day Moving Average | |
13 Week High | 0.0170 | |
14 Day RSI at 80% | 0.0163 | |
0.0111 | 38.2% Retracement from 13 Week High | |
14 Day RSI at 70% | 0.0097 | |
0.0093 | 50% Retracement from 13 Week High/Low | |
0.0074 | 38.2% Retracement from 13 Week Low | |
Pivot Point 2nd Level Resistance | 0.0071 | |
0.0069 | 3-10 Day MACD Oscillator Stalls | |
Pivot Point 1st Level Resistance | 0.0063 | |
4 Week High | 0.0062 | |
Current Price | 0.0054 | Current Price |
passieren könnte, bei bluecreek energy war 2009 ebenfalls Kevin Norris CEO ;)
DEKANIA CORP. TO ACQUIRE BLUECREEK ENERGY, INC.;
FILES EXTENSION PROXY WITH SEC TO COMPLETE TRANSACTION
Dekania Corp. (AMEX: DEK, DEK.U, DEK.WS) (“Dekania”), a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that completed its IPO in February 2007, and BlueCreek Energy, Inc., an energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of coal bed methane properties, today announced entering into a non-binding letter of intent for Dekania Corp. to acquire BlueCreek Energy. The letter of intent is subject to the execution of a definitive agreement, which is expected to be finalized in January.
The transaction – structured as a share exchange under which BlueCreek shareholders will receive Dekania Corp. shares – is expected to close by June 15, 2009. Financial terms of the transaction value BlueCreek at $80 million, less the amount of any assumed indebtedness.
Following completion of the transaction, the combined company will apply to retain Dekania Corp.’s listing on NYSE Alternext. Kevin Norris, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of BlueCreek Energy, will lead the combined company together with his existing senior management team, which David Nathaniel, Chief Investment Officer of Dekania Corp., will join. Details of the post-transaction corporate name of the company will be disclosed in the coming months preceding the completion of the acquisition.
In a related development, Dekania Corp. filed a preliminary proxy statement with the Securities Exchange Commission relating to a special meeting of its stockholders scheduled for February 6, 2009, at which its stockholders are expected to approve an extension to the time period during which it may consummate a business combination to August 31, 2009. The record date for the special meeting is January 16, 2009.
Kevin Norris, Founder and Chairman of the Board of BlueCreek Energy, said, “We are pleased to undertake this transaction with Dekania Corp., which when completed, will provide us with the additional capital and public currency that we will deploy to take advantage of multiple strategic opportunities that are emerging in our space. The additional financial flexibility that we are gaining through this strategic combination positions BlueCreek for continued expansion and development, even as investor interest in our space keeps growing. My senior management team and I look forward to building an even brighter future for our investors, our customers and our business partners through this transaction.”
David Nathaniel, Chief Investment Officer of Dekania Corp., said, “We believe that this transaction offers the best avenue towards maximizing value for our shareholders , by partnering with a growth-oriented company in an industry that continues to grow. While BlueCreek’s industry is a departure from our prior focus on transactions in the insurance industry, we believe that severely adverse insurance industry headwinds, ongoing growth of the energy sector’s potential and recent transitions in our own investor base make this a highly opportunistic deal that we are confident will meet with the approval of our shareholders. We will execute on next steps in this acquisition process as expeditiously as possible, and I look forward to continuing to play a significant role as a member of the company’s post-transaction senior management team.”
Kevin Norris
Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Norris has 30 years of industry experience with various energy companies including Apache Corporation, Universal Fuels Company, TOP Gas Gathering and BlueCreek Energy. Through his career, Mr. Norris has been involved in the drilling, operating, transportation and marketing of both oil and gas wells and specifically CBM (Coal bed Methane) wells for the past 11 years. Mr. Norris spent 15 years with e2 Business Services, Inc. a company which provided outsourced administration and marketing services, as well as software solutions. While at e2, Mr. Norris aided the company in its design of a proprietary gas control system designed specifically to accommodate wellhead gas scheduling, marketing, allocations, balancing, invoicing and accounting for wellhead and downstream gas transactions. After founding BlueCreek Energy in 2006, the company grew to ownership in 78 producing wells (42 operated) and over 20 BCF in reserves (3P).
heute gehört sie walter energy und macht
und die machen ne menge umsatz und gewinn
Revenue: | $2.4 Billion |